Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jenn" wrote in
message In article .com, ScottW wrote: On Sep 19, 12:39 pm, Jenn wrote: In article . com, ScottW wrote: On Sep 18, 5:50 pm, Jenn wrote: Excellent "As We See It" in the new issue, John. What was so "excellent".....or is usenet now your preferred pesonal comm path? ScottW It's about an "unintentional" blind test and the audibility of differences in digital files. and what was excellent? It is well written, and it shows how to at least one group of listeners high-rez digital audio can sound better than redbook and MP3 at 320 and 192kbps. Based on past experience, there's probably a clam in the test set up or analysis. But many will be impressed by the quality of writing, and overlook the rest. ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
thanks john | Marketplace | |||
John Oram..... | Pro Audio | |||
John Simonton RIP | Pro Audio | |||
WTB: John Hardy M1 | Pro Audio |