Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"c. leeds" writes:
Chung wrote: Yes, digital audio did not take over immediately. One reason is that the cost of the CD player was very high in the first year, or maybe two years. Back then you had to really care about sound to invest in a CD player and the CD's. You must be joking, right? I agree with him, and I am not joking. I made the decision to invest in the then-expensive CD player and CD replacements precisely because I cared about the sound. And I think he has a valid point: the "early adopters" have to see something signficantly better in a technology in order to shell out the extra cash to get in on the ground floor. At the time I was an electrical engineer developing part of a $40M satellite tracking system for one of those government agencies you don't talk about in the clear, the point being I was seeped in technology (and still am) and knew my way around the digital world. -- % Randy Yates % "With time with what you've learned, %% Fuquay-Varina, NC % they'll kiss the ground you walk %%% 919-577-9882 % upon." %%%% % '21st Century Man', *Time*, ELO http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: SDAT SB-E850 w/Vifa PL27TG-35-06 High Resolution Tweeter Upgrade | Marketplace | |||
Nesa one high resolution audio ologram | High End Audio | |||
The nesa one high resolution analogue matrix surround | High End Audio | |||
Q: Very High Resolution Microphones | Pro Audio | |||
FA: DH Labs Silver Sonic Q-10 high resolution loudspeaker cable | Marketplace |