Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radium wrote:
Actually, with most stereo music, if you invert the phase of one channel and combine with the other non-inverted, you get a mono without the main vocals, bass, and percussion. This is because -- usually -- the lead vocals, bass, and percussion are recorded identically in both the left and right channels. The paino, chorus, guitar, and synth pads are usually recorded differently in the left and right channel -- hence you won't lose these sounds if you process the audio file in the aformentioned manner. Most "voice cancellors" use this technique. Of course, this method assumes that the voice is recorded in the center of the stereo channels while non-vocals are not in phase for both channels. No good for the old old songs where everything is recorded in mono. Fascinating. A mono sum technique that is incompatible with mono source material. Please tell us more. //Walt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
POLL for RADAR users and other interested parties | Pro Audio | |||
New poll on XP | Pro Audio | |||
New poll on XP | Pro Audio | |||
What are they Teaching | Audio Opinions | |||
Some new poll results - Bye, Bye Bush | Audio Opinions |