Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor Wilson wrote:
**True. What you said was bull****. Now, pay attention to my words. Focus on: "Otherwise identical". Also focus on: "Poorly designed". If you, like I have, taken a well designed Class A/B amp and cranked the bias current up to 100 Watts Class A, you will have noted no sonic differences between the Class A/B operation and the Class A operation. OTOH, I have taken crappily designed Class A/B amps and cranked the bias up to high levels of Class A and found significant sonic improvements from doing so. No, that bears no connection with what I said. I said that if you take a class B amplifier and crank the gain up into the A/B range, that the sound quality may be subjectively worse even though the THD is reduced. I said nothing at ALL about full class A operation. IOW: The design is more important than the Class of operation. Class A will help a bad design and, at best, do nothing to a good design. Absolutely. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tubes vs solid state | Audio Opinions | |||
solid state vs tubes? | Tech | |||
KISS 191B by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Which 6550 for SVT reissue? | Vacuum Tubes |