Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MINe 109" wrote in message
In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "MINe 109" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: Even though you can't hear these frequencies, they add something subliminal to the way the music affects you. Interesting theory, but how are you going show that this is right if there are no conscous affects? Oohashi measured brain waves to do this. http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/83/6/3548 And if you believe that.... Why don't you dispute it then? Been there, done that many times, Stephen should be well-aware of the details, He's trolling, as usual. You asked how one could show the affects of high frequencies. Oohashi did that. No he didn't. His work is greviously flawed, and I've explained how in detail. Since you know he did so, that makes you the troll. Horsefeathers! And you didn't dispute so much as reject the findings. Wrong, I've deconstructed the paper and shown where the procedures were grossly flawed. If anybody rejected anybody's findings Stephen, it is you who have rejected but not ever properly responded to mine about Oohashi. Oohashi's paper is widely revilied and discredited. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |