Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is this true regarding digital recording?

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

Even though you can't hear these frequencies, they
add something subliminal to the way the music
affects you.

Interesting theory, but how are you going show that
this is right if there are no conscous affects?

Oohashi measured brain waves to do this.

http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/83/6/3548

And if you believe that....

Why don't you dispute it then?


Been there, done that many times, Stephen should be
well-aware of the details, He's trolling, as usual.


You asked how one could show the affects of high
frequencies. Oohashi did that.


No he didn't. His work is greviously flawed, and I've explained how in
detail.

Since you know he did so, that makes you the troll.


Horsefeathers!

And you didn't dispute so much as reject the findings.


Wrong, I've deconstructed the paper and shown where the procedures were
grossly flawed.

If anybody rejected anybody's findings Stephen, it is you who have rejected
but not ever properly responded to mine about Oohashi.

Oohashi's paper is widely revilied and discredited.


 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk xy Pro Audio 385 December 29th 04 12:00 AM
Artists cut out the record biz [email protected] Pro Audio 64 July 9th 04 10:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"