Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"S888Wheel" wrote in message
Arny said I have legal proof in the form of a sworn statement, that such a scheme exists. No. What you have is a lawsuit. Pardon me for speaking in practical terms. You predicted the clerk wouldn't even accept it for filing based on your misconceptions of the law. I was speaking figuratively, you dolt. You jumped all over Middius for not checking up on the law but it appears that you are still guilty of the same thing. Dream on. It is no surprise that you would find the demand for money in the lawsuit amounts to a money grabbing scheme. Something about having analytical skills. If you knew the procedures for limited lawsuits you would know that a dollar amount is required in the complaint. Dooohhh! If you are foolish enough to let this lawsuit go to trial you will find out. Until then they are none of your business. But you made them my business already. Actually sockpuppet wheel or whoever you are,, you made them part of your fraudulent little business and then forced me to be involved in it. What is known for sure sockpuppet wheel or whoever you are, is that you engaged individuals with female-sounding first names, and the same family name as you, in the act of reading of materials that are sex-related, and in your judgment morally reprehensible; for the purpose of obtaining money from me. In short, you them engaged them in sexual activity for money. I believe that on the street, that's called "pimping". Enjoy your life! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audio Myths was "System I'm designing - two questions" | Car Audio | |||
Crazy market saturation! | Car Audio | |||
where's the THRILL in audio? | General | |||
Audio Source vs. Cambridge Audio vs. NAD vs. Adcom | General | |||
Audio Source vs. Cambridge Audio vs. NAD vs. Adcom | Audio Opinions |