Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOTS of Kool-Aid being dispensed here. But lets look at a little bit of the=
math, if possible. Not knowing whether these assumptions are true or not, = let's just put them out the 1) Bi-Amping will deliver more total current to the bass drivers than if th= ey were powered from one amp.=20 2) In the article cited, a statement was made that there was far more energ= y in the bass than in the treble. Which seems to mitigate towards bi-amping= ..=20 3) There is some stuff within the article and elsewhere that suggests that = multiple power-supplies are better than a single power-supply of the same a= ggregate capacity.=20 So:=20 a) Let us take the case of two 30-watt amps vs. one 60 watt amp.=20 b) Let us take the "far more" to be 2 x current required.=20 c) Let us allow the Peak-to-Average to be 20 dB. Somewhere between Chamber = Orchestra and Full Orchestra.=20 d) let us make the speakers at 85dB - as Maggies were cited in the article. e) Let us assume that the source used is well recorded and well mastered.= =20 f) Let us assume that the electronics are of excellent quality and fully fu= nctional. =20 The Mid/Tweet will be capped at 100dB without clipping.=20 If the Mid-Tweet is making 98dB at 20 watts, and the bass needs 2 x the cur= rent, the bass will be starving at the available 30 watts.=20 Whereas a single 60-watt amp will be able to divide the current at a 2:1 ba= sis - 40 watts to the bass, 20 watts to the mid/tweet.=20 Add these discrepancies to the Saint-Saens Organ Symphony where the P/A is = 30 dB (if properly recorded) and bi-amping this way just will not work (nor= will the fairly anemic single 60).=20 The only way this works, horizontal or vertical is if both amps are capable= of driving the entirety of the speaker independently. Or the amps are diff= erent in capacity but chosen to handle the differing loads. Either is fine,= and either is practical, but the utter, complete and irredeemable BS about= "power supplies" and such is neither.=20 Now, on the practicalities of horizontal vs. vertical - I have the capacity= to do both, using up to four (4) theoretically identical amps. I will tell= you by direct experience that four amps adding up to the same wattage as m= y single brute-force power amp does not compare to that single amp. Brute h= as the capacity to send whatever is needed to whatever section of the speak= er (Maggies) that needs it at levels approaching the absurd, and handle tra= nsients of up to 120 dB without breathing hard, the four smaller units cann= ot do this.=20 On bi-wiring, I use 12-gauge 19-strand THHN wire twisted in a drill to abou= t 6 turns per foot. Runs are about 10 feet or so. Seems sufficiently robust= not to need bi-wiring. And at ~US$110 per 500' (250' paired) with tax and = shipping, not so terribly expensive, either. With the additional virtue of = being able to be pulled around corners and across abrasive surfaces without= damage.=20 Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA=20 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Store vinyl vertical? horizontal? | Pro Audio | |||
Perfect amp for horizontal passive bi-amping | High End Audio | |||
vertical audtio | Audio Opinions | |||
vertical arrays | Tech |