[Jenn[_2_]]

ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:32 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 3, 11:59 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 3, 4:20 pm, Jenn
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

On Mar 3, 6:10 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message


et..
.

In article

,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 2, 6:37 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
.
com
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

On Mar 2, 7:03 pm, MiNe 109

wrote:
In article

ups.
com,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

On Mar 2, 2:21 pm, "Arny Krueger"

wrote:
"MiNe 109"
wrote in
message

...

Some time back, I heard a conversation
about organ
building
and
the
difficulties of designing a mechanical
action. An
engineer
type
helpfully pointed out that you could
substitute a
pneumatic
or
electric
system and solve all the problems.

Apparently the whole lot of you had no clue
about the
fact that
both
alternative methods have been implemented
for over 100
years.
FWIW,
the
Moeller at church uses an electric system.

LOL! Right on schedule.

Um, GOIA, I think this proves your
insanity...again. ;-)

Lord. Despite the inadvertent troll, I still
advocate
shunning, but
he
does make such a large target sometimes.

Shoot at the very large drone with the "JACKASS"
markings on
either
side.

shaking my head at yet another innocent thread
hijacked

Hijacked? Arny comments and shhtard hands him the
keys
with glee at the joyride coming.

ScottW

Yes, I would call Arny's "comments" hijacking.

snip GOIA's insane ramblings

Let him rant. It probably makes him feel like a big man to
troll.

Still can't just ignore him. How childish.
I'll talk about you but I won't talk to you. LoL.
Grow up and face reality.

ScottW

Yep, it's really hard to ignore him, just as it is hard for you
to
ignore Shhhh and George.

Nothing hard about that. I do it whenever I feel like it.

lol For how long have you ignored them when you're actually here?

I ignore more than 50% of ssshtards and Middiots posts.

How many do you ignore where you are the target? About the same as I do
in Arny's case, it seems to me.

Are you suggesting even a higher percentage are not worthy of
a response? You may be right.

I'm suggesting that you should follow your own advice if you wish to
have any credibility.



I have this "thing" about someone calling me a
"bigot".

Nothing like advertising your buttons if you want to
get them pushed.

What normal person doesn't have an aversion to being called a bigot?

Exactly. So you're not "special".

Who said that I am?

Why take it so personal and act like it means anything to anyone?

Again, check the mirror.





But in fact, I made a comment about yet another on-topic
thread being hijacked. I didn't mention Arny until YOU did.

I'm not compelled to act according to your weakness.
I've no problem ignoring Arny when necessary.
Reality is...Arny's little snipes would be trivial if it wasn't
the
voluminous replies by the ridiculers. You've implied this
yourself
when you say he is best ignored. You just fail to practice what
you
preach.

lol That's fine, Scott. Clearly you see yourself as the cop here.


I'm not sure you see anything clearly, especially your own hypocrisy.

Of course you're not.


Enjoy your role. Meanwhile, yes, as I clearly admitted, it's hard
to
ignore someone who makes it his business to annoy and lie about you.

Join the club.

So you see my point.


Shhtard, Middiot, Atkinson, Stephen and even you
occasionally have intentionally distorted my position.

I don't recall ever doing that. Perhap you could provide an example.



The best I can do right now is not post to him here.

But you just have to talk about him. I see little difference except
volume.
You're still making it about Arny which in reality should be the last
thing you want to do.

ScottW

I have a difficult time letting him lie about me, true.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Time for some self-reflective yapping.

You're one of least self aware people around.

Scottie, when did you become terrified of dictionaries? You've been misusing
common words for years on Usenet, and despite being urged to crack a
dictionary on hundreds of occasions, you continue to flout that simple
directive.

Now we have to add "least" to The List.


--

"It is you who are completely unaware of what I perceive until
I choose to tell you. I rarely do."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Feb. 3 2009

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 5, 3:04*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 4, 1:58*pm, Jenn wrote:

I have a difficult time letting him lie about me, true.

*Me thinks you protest too much.

While the rest of us think that here's the proof you're OK with
telling people what to say.

Didn't you just deny doing that. 2pid? LoL.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 4, 1:58*pm, Jenn wrote:
ScottW2 wrote:

Yep, it's really hard to ignore him, just as it is hard for you
to
ignore Shhhh and George.

Nothing hard about that. *I do it whenever I feel like it.

lol *For how long have you ignored them when you're actually here?

*I ignore more than 50% of ssshtards and Middiots posts.

How many do you ignore where you are the target? About the same as I do
in Arny's case, it seems to me.

If you're keeping count you're ignoring them far less than I am.

Who said that I'm keeping count? Like you, I'm estimating.



Are you suggesting even a higher percentage are not worthy of
a response? *You may be right.

I'm suggesting that you should follow your own advice if you wish to
have any credibility.

I find it consistently amusing that you actually equate Shhtard with
Arny.
That is quite the pedestal you've put him on...LoL.

I'm not equating them at all. Their behaviors are quite different.

Do you think Arny sings Karaoke?




I have this "thing" about someone calling me a
"bigot".

*Nothing like advertising your buttons if you want to
get them pushed.

What normal person doesn't have an aversion to being called a bigot?

*Exactly. *So you're not "special".

Who said that I am?

"I have this thing"... as if no one else has a thing.

lol



*Why take it so personal and act like it means anything to anyone?

Again, check the mirror.

You're so repetitious with the same lame justification.
So shhh sucks as much as Arny IYO and I should have nothing to do
with him.

I didn't say that. You're still missing the point.

Ok, now what about you? Can you face reality? Apparently not.

Meaning?




*But in fact, I made a comment about yet another on-topic
thread being hijacked. *I didn't mention Arny until YOU did.

I'm not compelled to act according to your weakness.
I've no problem ignoring Arny when necessary.
Reality is...Arny's little snipes would be trivial if it wasn't
the
voluminous replies by the ridiculers. *You've implied this
yourself
when you say he is best ignored. You just fail to practice what
you
preach.

lol *That's fine, Scott. *Clearly you see yourself as the cop here.

*I'm not sure you see anything clearly, especially your own hypocrisy.

Of course you're not.

Yeah, that makes sense.

Yes, it does.




Enjoy your role. *Meanwhile, yes, as I clearly admitted, it's hard
to
ignore someone who makes it his business to annoy and lie about you.

Join the club. *

So you see my point.

Shhtard, Middiot, Atkinson, Stephen and even you
occasionally have intentionally distorted my position.

I don't recall ever doing that.

Of course you don't. You're one of least self aware people around.

Wow, considering the source, I'm speechless.



Perhap you could provide an example.

The inevitable next time I'll be sure to clue you in.

Please do. Meanwhile, the record shows that you can't provide an
example.



The best I can do right now is not post to him here.

*But you just have to talk about him. I see little difference except
volume.
You're still making it about Arny which in reality should be the last
thing you want to do.

ScottW

I have a difficult time letting him lie about me, true.

Me thinks you protest too much.

OK. Why don't you and I make an agreement? Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. Deal?

[[email protected]]

On 5 Mar, 16:04, ScottW2 wrote:

*That is quite the pedestal you've put him on...LoL.
*Do you think Arny sings Karaoke?



Most definitely!!!!!
Dust in the Wind, to the cheesey "instrumental" accompaniement
he had on his now defunct pc consulting website.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

You're one of least self aware people around.

This doesn't make any sense except "Scott doesn't like her."

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

Why don't you and I make an agreement? Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. Deal?

Scottie really does have fleas, you know.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 5, 10:26*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Jenn said:

Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Scottie really does have fleas, you know.

And 2pid admitted to sleeping with mongrel dogs.

That one isn't a lie, BTW.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?


ScottW

Seriously. How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?

ScottW

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.
Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? He's in
desperate need you know. But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

ScottW

She's equating your relationship with Shhh! to her relationship with AK.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 6, 2:39*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me
as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as
they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?

ScottW

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

*There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.
*Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? *He's in
desperate need you know. *But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

ScottW

She's equating your relationship with Shhh! to her relationship with AK.

Arny's in love. Do you think sssshtards in love? He does act like
a
potential stalker.

No, you've got it wrong. It's about her relationship to Arny, not the
other way round.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 6, 4:39*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:

She's equating your relationship with Shhh! to her relationship with AK.

Oh, this is one of those "analogous relationship" things.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 6, 4:53*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 2:39*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me
as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as
they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

*There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.
*Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? *He's in
desperate need you know. *But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

She's equating your relationship with Shhh! to her relationship with AK.

* Arny's in love. *Do you think sssshtards in love? *He does act like
a
potential stalker.

No, you've got it wrong. It's about her relationship to Arny, not the
other way round.

Does knowing 2pid will fail to get it before he even posts make me a
genius?

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Mar 6, 4:53*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 2:39*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:

* Arny's in love. *Do you think sssshtards in love? *He does act like
a
potential stalker.

No, you've got it wrong. It's about her relationship to Arny, not the
other way round.

Does knowing 2pid will fail to get it before he even posts make me a
genius?

Since he's working so hard to make you look good, he must be "in love".

Stephen

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?

ScottW

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.

Incorrect. I'm doing nothing of the sort.

Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? He's in
desperate need you know. But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

So I take it that you aren't willing to totally ignore Shhhh?

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 8:19*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
*So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

I know that the 3 of you think you're "all" there is. LoL.

I meant anyone but you.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 9:24*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:19*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
*So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

I know that the 3 of you think you're "all" there is. *LoL.

I meant anyone but you.

You mean anything but the truth.

I think everyone but you would benefit if you took up Jenn's challenge.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 12:11*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 9:24*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:19*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
*So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

I know that the 3 of you think you're "all" there is. *LoL.

I meant anyone but you.

*You mean anything but the truth.

I think everyone but you would benefit if you took up Jenn's challenge.

Why don't you take up her challenge so everyone else will
benefit?

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 6, 5:15*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about me
as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as much as
they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will give a
crap?

ScottW

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

*There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.

Incorrect. *I'm doing nothing of the sort.

So who would be getting the better deal?

Who cares? If I don't refer to Arny's posts about me, and you don't
reply or refer to Shhh's posts about you, the group improves.



*Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? *He's in
desperate need you know. *But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

So I take it that you aren't willing to totally ignore Shhhh?

Tell you what, I'll ignore Arny and Shhh and George if you do the
same. They all exhibit by your own admission, boorish behavior.
You're just the brunt of Arny's at times. Don't you think singling
him out
is selfish on your part?

I'll go with ignoring them except on audio/music topics, sure.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
MiNe 109 wrote:

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 9:24*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:19*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
*So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

I know that the 3 of you think you're "all" there is. *LoL.

I meant anyone but you.

You mean anything but the truth.

I think everyone but you would benefit if you took up Jenn's challenge.

Exactly.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 7, 7:18*pm, Jenn wrote:

I'll go with ignoring them except on audio/music topics, sure.

I'm all sad on the inside now.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

I'll go with ignoring them except on audio/music topics, sure.

I'm all sad on the inside now.

Mistress is offering to make a sacrifice in the interest of the improving
the health of the group as a whole. Doesn't that sound familiar?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 10:10*am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 6:18*pm, Jenn wrote:
*ScottW2 wrote:

*Tell you what, I'll ignore Arny and Shhh and George if you do the
same. *They all exhibit by your own admission, boorish behavior.
You're just the brunt of Arny's at times. *Don't you think singling
him out
is selfish on your part?

I'll go with ignoring them except on audio/music topics, sure.

* LoL. *Pathetic offer of no consequence to you.

Are you game, 2pid? No more OT propaganda blitzes? LoL.

* You either either disdain people of
boorish behavior or you don't. *You obviously don't.

No, 2pid, this is your black and white world view...again. LoL.

Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean everybody else is too. LoL.

This is your mentality....

This is your upholstery... LoL.

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

Iain

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 12:09*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 8, 10:05*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote

I'm already ignoring AK.

I too! *It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

*Immaturity works for you?
*That can only be over infantilism.

Isn't that what you're advocating that Jenn do, 2pid?

BTW, I see that you can't help yourself concerning OT propaganda
blitzes, so it's probably best not to rag on anybody else's posting
behavior. One should probably clean up one's act first, don't you
think? (Rhetorical question: Of course you don't!) LoL.

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"ScottW2" wrote in message
...
On Mar 8, 10:05 am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

Immaturity works for you?
That can only be over infantilism.

So do you think that Arny makes a
worthwhile contribution to this NG?

Iain

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 2:35*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:11*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 9:24*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:19*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article

m,

*ScottW2 wrote:
*So who would be getting the better deal?

All the rest of us.

I know that the 3 of you think you're "all" there is. *LoL.

I meant anyone but you.

*You mean anything but the truth.

I think everyone but you would benefit if you took up Jenn's challenge.

*Why don't you take up her challenge so everyone else will
benefit?

I'm already ignoring AK.

You get 33%. Was that passing in your school?

You're awfully concerned about passing grades. I hope it's not a sore
point for you.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 8, 10:05*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! *It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

Immaturity works for you?
That can only be over infantilism.

Isn't not replying to AK what you're advocating? Why is it a good idea
when you say so but infantile when HH does?

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

*Why don't you take up her challenge so everyone else will
benefit?

I'm already ignoring AK.

You get 33%.

Forgot to mention: her challenge was to ignore AK, so that's 100%.

Stephen

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 7, 6:18*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:15*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 6, 12:50*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:38*pm, Jenn wrote:

OK. *Why don't you and I make an agreement? *Arny can lie about
me
as
much as he wants to, and everyone else can lie about you as
much as
they
want to, and neither of us respond. *Deal?

Arny vs everyone....some deal.
How about Arny can lie about both of us and neither of us will
give a
crap?

ScottW

Seriously. *How about Arny for me and Shhhh for you?

*There you go equating Arny and Shhhtard yet again.

Incorrect. *I'm doing nothing of the sort.

* So who would be getting the better deal?

Who cares? *If I don't refer to Arny's posts about me, and you don't
reply or refer to Shhh's posts about you, the group improves.



*Are you going to fill in giving sshiie my sage advice? *He's in
desperate need you know. *But since his reportoire has been long
replayed over and over, what can it hurt?

So I take it that you aren't willing to totally ignore Shhhh?

*Tell you what, I'll ignore Arny and Shhh and George if you do the
same. *They all exhibit by your own admission, boorish behavior.
You're just the brunt of Arny's at times. *Don't you think singling
him out
is selfish on your part?

I'll go with ignoring them except on audio/music topics, sure.

LoL. Pathetic offer of no consequence to you.
You either either disdain people of
boorish behavior or you don't. You obviously don't.

Responding to posts on audio/music is, what's the phrase? Oh yes: "on
topic".

So, are you willing to ignore Shhhh or not?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

I'm already ignoring AK.

You get 33%. Was that passing in your school?

You're awfully concerned about passing grades. I hope it's not a sore
point for you.

Witless claims to have graduated from engineering school. Isn't that a
gasser?

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

I'm already ignoring AK.

You get 33%. Was that passing in your school?

You're awfully concerned about passing grades. I hope it's not a sore
point for you.

Witless claims to have graduated from engineering school. Isn't that a
gasser?

Probably not smart enough to get into a program that pays less.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

So, are you willing to ignore Shhhh or not?

We can now conclude that positive-reinforcement conditioning does not work
on Witlessmongrel. Time to bring out the zapper.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 12:08 pm, ScottW2 wrote:

I'm already ignoring AK.

You get 33%. Was that passing in your school?

At my school the people on the short bus didn't grade papers, 2pid.

[Arny Krueger]

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
news

"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

It works for little girls.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Responding to posts on audio/music is, what's the phrase? Oh yes: "on
topic".

Something you will easily sacrifice to be one of the boyz.

So, are you willing to ignore Shhhh or not?

Now that would be a good idea. But grow up Jenn,and don't try to pretend
that you're talking behind someone's back on a public forum.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 8, 11:02*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 8, 10:05*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! *It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

*Immaturity works for you?
*That can only be over infantilism.

Isn't not replying to AK what you're advocating? Why is it a good idea
when you say so but infantile when HH does?

I think I'll quit talking to you but talk about how dense you are
at times.

Why do you choose self-marginalization over honest discussion? If you
wish to commit intellectual suicide by bits no one can stop you.

You also seem to present this proposition as analogous to my position.
It isn't. Perhaps you misread me in your rush to judgment.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 9, 10:33*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 8, 11:02*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 8, 10:05*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! *It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.

*Immaturity works for you?
*That can only be over infantilism.

Isn't not replying to AK what you're advocating? Why is it a good idea
when you say so but infantile when HH does?

*I think I'll quit talking to you but talk about how dense you are
at times.

Why do you choose self-marginalization over honest discussion?

I don't.

If you stop replying to me but go mutter in the corner about how "dense"
I am, you are.

Let me know when you become capable of honesty.

You don't seem to recognize it when you see it. Either you don't
understand the word or you use it as an all-purpose club, like Trots and
genitals.

Anyway, for your less than astute perception, it isn't the no reply
that I disdain, it's the substitute "talk about him" that is really
quite
childish.

I haven't done that, not that there's anything wrong with it. Meanwhile,
you're talking about talking about him.

Stephen

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"ScottW2" wrote in message
...
On Mar 8, 10:47 am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"ScottW2" wrote in message

...
On Mar 8, 10:05 am, "Iain Churches" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

...

I'm already ignoring AK.

Stephen

I too! It was Herbert H who advised:
"Talk about him, but not to him"
It works.
Immaturity works for you?

That can only be over infantilism.

So do you think that Arny makes a
worthwhile contribution to this NG?

Since you think trolling Arny is worthwhile we're going
have difficulty discussing what is worthwhile.

For some reason, I don't connect your name with
worthwhile discussion on this group, Scott.
This is probably because every time I look, you
seem to be up to your neck in flames:-)

Regarding Mr Krueger,. It is abundantly
clear to me, as a professional recording
engineer, and a semi-pro musician and
tube amp builder, that Arny, is a total
inposter. Like many others, I objected
strongly to his claiming to be a "pro
recordist" (his term) and "FOH mixer"

It has been clear to me for a long time, that
Arny has considerable knowledge of
digital technology. Why can't that be enough?
His status as an amateur "recordist", working
with his church choir is laudable. Why must
he try to pretend it is something it isn't?
How does this "flexing of the truth" relate
to his claims to be a Christian?

The fact that he cannot (dare not) produce
a single evaluation sample to support his
claim of professional status, speaks volumes
(against him)

Regards
Iain