Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:34:26 -0700, hoarse with no name wrote:
If programs implementing the T-S laws are so good and allow such a good understanding of how the enclosure and related issues affect sound, then should not the determining factor differentiating speaker designs be the driver design itself? The equations dealing with the T-S parameters do nothing more than deal with the way the fundamental spring/mass resonance of the driver interacts with the enclosure to form a high pass filter. They have no relationship to the sound of the drivers outside this region. All of that is still a matter of manufacturers making good, flat drivers. d |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() hoarse with no name wrote: If programs implementing the T-S laws are so good and allow such a good understanding of how the enclosure and related issues affect sound, then should not the determining factor differentiating speaker designs be the driver design itself? A couple of points. First, the Thiele-Small MODEL (it's not a set of laws, it's a model) is accurate within the domain in which the model is defined. And that, you will find from reading every article authored by the two gentlemen on the topic, has specific limits imposed on it. Relevant to your question is that the model is defined for operation within what's called the "piston" band of the driver's operation. By "piston band" is meant that the wavelengths of the radiated sound is substantially long enough relative to the driver radiating diameter that the radiation impedance of the driver is behaving in a specific and very predictable fashion. And, for the most part, that means low frequency behavior only. For example, the piston band for a typical 8" driver is considered to go no higher than about 600 Hz. (A reasonable approximation for the upper limit of the piston band of a circular driver is the speed of sound divided by the circumference of the driver. Since an 8" driver has an effect radiating diameter about 7", that means the circumference of the driver is pi * 7", 21" or about 1.83 feet. Speed of sound at STP is 1129 ft/sec so 1129 ft/sec divided by 1.83 ft gives you about 617 Hz). Above that region, other factors begin to dominate, and the Thiele- Small model no longer accurately describes behavior. Another limit of the model is that it assumes time-invariant, linear behavior. Drivers, at least the ones we can put our hands on, don't meet these requirements to a greater or lesser extent. A second point: the Thiele-Small model is not about drivers, it's about SYSTEMS. The useful feature, especially of Small's work, is that it casts the system analysis in terms of the integrated behavior of the driver electrical, mechanical and acoustical elements and the enclosure's mechanical and acoustical elements and, what makes it both simplifying and powerful, is that it relates them all in parameters of compatible units. One could, for example, look at the electrical resistance in MECHANICAL units, just as easily as one can view mechanical friction in electrical units. This makes the analysis and synthesis of systems amenable to extant tools (for example, electrical circuit mesh analyzers such as SPICE). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the most part, the most powerful determining factor of a commercial
speaker design is economics and marketing. For the end buyer, a lot depends on the intended application of the speaker and personal taste. Do you like trumpets, violins or clarinets? They all can play roughly in the same range. James. ![]() "hoarse with no name" wrote in message ... If programs implementing the T-S laws are so good and allow such a good understanding of how the enclosure and related issues affect sound, then should not the determining factor differentiating speaker designs be the driver design itself? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:00:04 +0100, Don Pearce
wrote: On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:34:26 -0700, hoarse with no name wrote: If programs implementing the T-S laws are so good and allow such a good understanding of how the enclosure and related issues affect sound, then should not the determining factor differentiating speaker designs be the driver design itself? The equations dealing with the T-S parameters do nothing more than deal with the way the fundamental spring/mass resonance of the driver interacts with the enclosure to form a high pass filter. They have no relationship to the sound of the drivers outside this region. All of that is still a matter of manufacturers making good, flat drivers. The T-S parameters can tell you the required volume of the enclosure and what shape should be the port, but they tell you nothing about the internal dimensions, shape or resonant qualities of the enclsure, all of which are just as important as the drivers. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sub Amps - a Follow up Question | Tech | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Powerful Argument in Favor of Agnosticism and Athetism | Audio Opinions | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |