Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any suggestion guys.
I want to mix 24 bit-48khz. It's solo voice with Orchestra. Kevin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matrixmusic" wrote in message
oups.com... Any suggestion guys. I want to mix 24 bit-48khz. It's solo voice with Orchestra. Kevin Hi Kevin, I'm not totally sure what you are asking. Are you mixing from an analog source ( mixer? ) and want an A/D converter to record your final stereo mix to a digital format? Or do you want 4 to 48 channels of A/D so you can record all of the individual tracks initially to digital but you want the converters to be as good as possible so that when you mix it turns out well? You might want to give us a hint at your budget, especially if the latter scenario is the correct one. In either case I would think that he Lavry Engineering Blue series converters would do an outstanding job for you. Best of luck! -- John L Rice |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
Matrixmusic wrote: Any suggestion guys. I want to mix 24 bit-48khz. It's solo voice with Orchestra. I'd look at the Prism and Lavry stuff, as well as the Weiss. The Grimm box sounded pretty amazing to be with a DSD output, but I don't know if they have got the PCM output module for it finished yet. Meitner's converters might also be worth listening to. The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from is the Studer D19. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Dorsey" wrote:
The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from is the Studer D19. Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer? -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lorin David Schultz wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote: The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from is the Studer D19. Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer? The sound. They just blew it. I know, hard to believe. Looked real good on paper... -- ha |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lorin David Schultz wrote:
Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer? "hank alrich" wrote: The sound. Oh, THAT. I thought maybe he was disappointed by the lacklustre front panel graphics. "The sound." No ****, gittar boy! I was kinda hopin' for a description of specific sonic characteristics the Studer lacks, or that it imposes to the detriment of happylistenage. Is it something you can characterize, or is this another case of our language not being equipped to describe what we hear? Looked real good on paper... That's what happens when you don't use the right Spice... -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lorin David Schultz wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote: The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from is the Studer D19. Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer? I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out just wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor was not even, either. It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the ability to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is very slick. It just didn't sound good. Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds bad, but for different reasons. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Lorin David Schultz wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote: The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from is the Studer D19. Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer? I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out just wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor was not even, either. It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the ability to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is very slick. It just didn't sound good. Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds bad, but for different reasons. --scott Can you compare them to the converters in the V-Eight? Predrag |