Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Matt
 
Posts: n/a
Default adat to usb interface i cant find

I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac. I've found many pci cards that
allow this but the new imac doesnt have slots (it has a round base).
I'm trying to interface the behringer ada8000 so i can record 8 tracks
simultaneous and also mix down 8 tracks with the 8 analog outs on the
unit. So i guess i have 2 questions: 1) is there a way to interface
with the imac thats reasonably affordable? (i.e., just an adaptor, not
another interface). 2) is there an adapter that allows you to use pci
cards with a computer that doesn't have slots for them? As always
thanks for any help guys (and girls)--MAtt
  #2   Report Post  
John_LeBlanc
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt" wrote in message
om...
I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac. I've found many pci cards that
allow this but the new imac doesnt have slots (it has a round base).
I'm trying to interface the behringer ada8000 so i can record 8 tracks
simultaneous and also mix down 8 tracks with the 8 analog outs on the
unit. So i guess i have 2 questions: 1) is there a way to interface
with the imac thats reasonably affordable? (i.e., just an adaptor, not
another interface). 2) is there an adapter that allows you to use pci
cards with a computer that doesn't have slots for them? As always
thanks for any help guys (and girls)--MAtt


For the price, and given your equipment, looks like it's hard to beat the
Behringer BCA2000. It's a small control surface that connects via USB 2.0 and
gives you 8 channel ins and outs via ADAT lightpipe, as well as S/PIDF and
AES/EBU:
http://www.behringer.com/BCA2000/index.cfm?lang=ENG

They should become available by the end of the month for around $220.

John


  #3   Report Post  
Matt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John_LeBlanc" wrote in message ...
"Matt" wrote in message
om...
I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac. I've found many pci cards that
allow this but the new imac doesnt have slots (it has a round base).
I'm trying to interface the behringer ada8000 so i can record 8 tracks
simultaneous and also mix down 8 tracks with the 8 analog outs on the
unit. So i guess i have 2 questions: 1) is there a way to interface
with the imac thats reasonably affordable? (i.e., just an adaptor, not
another interface). 2) is there an adapter that allows you to use pci
cards with a computer that doesn't have slots for them? As always
thanks for any help guys (and girls)--MAtt



is that the only solution? it seems to be such a waste to get a full
standalone interface just for the adat I/O. I mean i dont want to
spend about as much for the adapter as the interface. Anybody know of
anything cheaper?

For the price, and given your equipment, looks like it's hard to beat the
Behringer BCA2000. It's a small control surface that connects via USB 2.0 and
gives you 8 channel ins and outs via ADAT lightpipe, as well as S/PIDF and
AES/EBU:
http://www.behringer.com/BCA2000/index.cfm?lang=ENG

They should become available by the end of the month for around $220.

John

  #6   Report Post  
EricK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John_LeBlanc wrote:
"Matt" wrote in message
om...

I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac. I've found many pci cards that
allow this but the new imac doesnt have slots (it has a round base).
I'm trying to interface the behringer ada8000 so i can record 8 tracks
simultaneous and also mix down 8 tracks with the 8 analog outs on the
unit. So i guess i have 2 questions: 1) is there a way to interface
with the imac thats reasonably affordable? (i.e., just an adaptor, not
another interface). 2) is there an adapter that allows you to use pci
cards with a computer that doesn't have slots for them? As always
thanks for any help guys (and girls)--MAtt



For the price, and given your equipment, looks like it's hard to beat the
Behringer BCA2000. It's a small control surface that connects via USB 2.0 and
gives you 8 channel ins and outs via ADAT lightpipe, as well as S/PIDF and
AES/EBU:
http://www.behringer.com/BCA2000/index.cfm?lang=ENG


This is by far the cheapest option. The only other option I can think of
would be a MOTU 828. Those go for about $800 or so. The 828 is firewire,
but I believe you have that, right?

--
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills
Multi-Track Masters on CD-ROM
www.Raw-Tracks.com

  #8   Report Post  
Romeo Rondeau
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac. I've found many pci cards that
allow this but the new imac doesnt have slots (it has a round base).
I'm trying to interface the behringer ada8000 so i can record 8 tracks
simultaneous and also mix down 8 tracks with the 8 analog outs on the
unit. So i guess i have 2 questions: 1) is there a way to interface
with the imac thats reasonably affordable? (i.e., just an adaptor, not
another interface). 2) is there an adapter that allows you to use pci
cards with a computer that doesn't have slots for them? As always
thanks for any help guys (and girls)--MAtt



I realise it's a bit late now, but why did you choose to buy an imac?


I didnt choose to, it was a gift from 3 years ago. I totally
understand what you guys are saying too, I was just wondering if there
was a little single toslink-usb adapter that i could run and grab at
comp usa or something. It's just that I'm off of my job till september
so I'm trying a little to conserve the green. Thanks for the tips-MAtt


It's not an adapter type of solution. ADAT is optical and USB is electrical.


  #9   Report Post  
WillStG
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Matt)

I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac.


You got your IMac 3 years ago, I highly doubt it has USB 2.0 so you ain't
likely to get 8 tracks in the puppy with a USB interface, USB 1.1 is just too
slow. You need to look at a Firewire interface, and if the IMac is so old it
doesn't have that you're priced out of the market with your $220 limitation.

You *could* buy a Harmoni upgrade card for the Imac which gives older
Imacs firewire and a modest speed bump for $300, but then you need a firewire
device like the MOTU (around $800).

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits



  #10   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didnt choose to, it was a gift from 3 years ago. I totally
understand what you guys are saying too, I was just wondering if there
was a little single toslink-usb adapter that i could run and grab at
comp usa or something. It's just that I'm off of my job till september
so I'm trying a little to conserve the green. Thanks for the tips-MAtt


Besides, in addition to what Romeo said, you have to be careful because
toslink is a 2 channel optical format that you could probably find, but it
won't transfer 8 channels to usb, and older usb 1.0 or 1.1 isn't fast enough
for 8 channels even if a toslink converter could do it.

I'm only mentioning this because toslink and ADAT, although both optical,
use different protocols and have different data transfer restraints. I
realize your use of "toslink" could be a mis-statement, but for lurkers that
might not know the difference, it's always preferable to simply establish
the correct nomenclature.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio




  #11   Report Post  
EricK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roger W. Norman wrote:

snip
Besides, in addition to what Romeo said, you have to be careful because
toslink is a 2 channel optical format that you could probably find, but it
won't transfer 8 channels to usb, and older usb 1.0 or 1.1 isn't fast enough
for 8 channels even if a toslink converter could do it.

I'm only mentioning this because toslink and ADAT, although both optical,
use different protocols and have different data transfer restraints. I
realize your use of "toslink" could be a mis-statement, but for lurkers that
might not know the difference, it's always preferable to simply establish
the correct nomenclature.


I was under the impression that "Toslink" was the name for connector,
and the two different protocols are "S/PDIF" and "ADAT".

--
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills
Multi-Track Masters on CD-ROM
www.Raw-Tracks.com

  #15   Report Post  
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Matt) wrote in message . com...
ospam (WillStG) wrote in message ...
(Matt)


I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac.


You got your IMac 3 years ago, I highly doubt it has USB 2.0 so you ain't
likely to get 8 tracks in the puppy with a USB interface, USB 1.1 is just too
slow. You need to look at a Firewire interface, and if the IMac is so old it
doesn't have that you're priced out of the market with your $220 limitation.


My imac is a round based one with jaguar and 700mhz, this is not one
of those old multi-color models. It's the kind you could go to apple
today and buy. It most definitely has usb2.0. I've heard firewire is
faster but with my computer there jsut wont be that much difference
that its worth the extra pennies.


You *could* buy a Harmoni upgrade card for the Imac which gives older
Imacs firewire and a modest speed bump for $300, but then you need a firewire
device like the MOTU (around $800).


Believe me i would skip and optical interface and the connection to
the computer totally if i could just get a motu but as u said

MOTU (around $800)


that's why im not getting it.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits


If it isn't usb 2.0 it isn't an option at all. I think M-audio makes
the some pretty cheap firewire ones that have adat I/O.

Mike
http://www.mmeproductions.com


  #16   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, been busy on the remodel. Technically, yes, although if one can
describe ADAT to mean both the optical connector AND 8 channels of up to
24/48kHz, then I use the same method to designate that toslink is 2 channels
of 24/48kHz over optical. But if you use s/pdif as the protocol (which it
is) some people get confused because that also is the protocol of coaxial.
Easier to use the more generic although less technically correct terms, or
at least it produces less confusion in my little brain.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"EricK" wrote in message
...
Roger W. Norman wrote:

snip
Besides, in addition to what Romeo said, you have to be careful because
toslink is a 2 channel optical format that you could probably find, but

it
won't transfer 8 channels to usb, and older usb 1.0 or 1.1 isn't fast

enough
for 8 channels even if a toslink converter could do it.

I'm only mentioning this because toslink and ADAT, although both

optical,
use different protocols and have different data transfer restraints. I
realize your use of "toslink" could be a mis-statement, but for lurkers

that
might not know the difference, it's always preferable to simply

establish
the correct nomenclature.


I was under the impression that "Toslink" was the name for connector,
and the two different protocols are "S/PDIF" and "ADAT".

--
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills
Multi-Track Masters on CD-ROM
www.Raw-Tracks.com



  #19   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

True. The original s/pdif protocol only handled 20 bit/48 kHz but the 4
extra bits were s/pdif specific and hand nothing to do with audio itself.
There were an additional 4 bits of control data that ended up being squeezed
into the utility of s/pdif, but it's well outside of spec.

ADAT, however, using the same plastic optical cable and connector, always
supported 24 bit/48 kHz data transfer for 8 channels of data, and even if
it's not used with the Alesis name, ADAT specifics that set of data channels
and bandwidth over plastic. When you look on the back of your Mackie MDR it
says ADAT, not Alesis, and s/pdif is generally a coaxial cable on most units
(haven't looked at the Mackie standalone recorders in a long time). It's
just a matter of the market changing and using accepted norms that do not
represent the IEEE/IEC specs for wiring, but it conveys a lot of information
without all the addidional jargon.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1087741017k@trad...

In article

writes:

Technically, yes, although if one can
describe ADAT to mean both the optical connector AND 8 channels of up to
24/48kHz, then I use the same method to designate that toslink is 2

channels
of 24/48kHz over optical.


Picky clarification here. Alesis has always referred to the interface
as "Fiber optical" and "EIAJ jacks." The terms "ADAT Lightpipe," "ADAT
Optical" or just "ADAT" or "Lightpipe" that most of us use are all
industry jargon and nothing official. I guess that if ADAT is included
in the name in print, it should have a trademark symbol along with
it (which it rarely does).

TOSLink is Toshiba's brand of connector which has become the EIAJ (and
pretty much world wide) standard for the plastic fiber optic cable.
IEC-958 includes the use of this connector as one of the optional
two-channel digital interfaces. "S/PDIF" is a term that's so
convenient and so well understood that it won't die for a long time,
but really nobody actually makes it exactly the way Sony and Phillips
designed it any more.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo



  #21   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

True. The original s/pdif protocol only handled 20 bit/48 kHz but the 4
extra bits were s/pdif specific and hand nothing to do with audio itself.
There were an additional 4 bits of control data that ended up being squeezed
into the utility of s/pdif, but it's well outside of spec.


This is getting complicated. I don't know what S/PDIF (the REAL
S/PDIF) actually supported, but the real AES/EBU only supports
(officially) 20 bits. What you describe is true for AES/EBU. There's a
channel status bit that tells the receiving device to interpret the
"spare" bits as audio.

IEC-958/II (the consumer version, which evolved from S/PDIF) has
always had 24 bits that can legally carry audio data. IEC-958/I (the
pro version, which evolved from AES/EBU) still defines 20 official
bits for audio data, and the other 4 bits of a 24-bit data stream are
carried elsewhere, with a clue to interpret them as audio.

ADAT, however, using the same plastic optical cable and connector, always
supported 24 bit/48 kHz data transfer for 8 channels of data


The original ADAT optical interface only handled 20 bits, I believe
because of a limitation of their interface chip. (Garth?) It wasn't until
a generation or two later that it could carry 24 bits.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
  #22   Report Post  
Garth D. Wiebe
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Rivers wrote:

ADAT, however, using the same plastic optical cable and connector, always
supported 24 bit/48 kHz data transfer for 8 channels of data



The original ADAT optical interface only handled 20 bits, I believe
because of a limitation of their interface chip. (Garth?) It wasn't until
a generation or two later that it could carry 24 bits.


The original ADAT optical specification for which they filed for a U.S.
Patent in 1992 (and were granted 2 years later: #5,297,181) specifies
24 bit audio. You might remember Alesis ADAT "SVHS" was 16 bits, as was
Tascam "Hi-8" DTRS. Then recall that Alesis came out with their 20 bit
version of the ADAT tape machine, excusing themselves in the various
marketing literature for going all the way to 24 bits. This is probably
what you are remembering.

Their current interface chipset, the AL1401A and AL1402, does support 24
bits now.

  #24   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Here's a little blurb from
http://www.mtsu.edu/~dsmitche/rim420...Interface.html

Here is a short comparision table of AES/EBU and S/PDIF interfaces:

AES/EBU S/PDIF (IEC-958)



Cabling 110 ohm shileded TP 75 ohm coaxial or fiber

Connector 3-pin XLR RCA (or BNC)

Signal level 3..10V 0.5..1V

Modulation biphase-mark-code biphase-mark-code

Subcode information ASCII ID text SCMS copy protection info

Max. Resolution 24 bits 20 bits (24 bit optional)As
you can see, AES/EBU 24 bits, S/PDIF 20 bits as the original standard.

Hey, I still do have the 2 brain cells, Mike! g IEC 958/II raises S/PDIF
to 24 bits as part of the spec, rather than an option.
--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1087781135k@trad...

In article

writes:

True. The original s/pdif protocol only handled 20 bit/48 kHz but the 4
extra bits were s/pdif specific and hand nothing to do with audio

itself.
There were an additional 4 bits of control data that ended up being

squeezed
into the utility of s/pdif, but it's well outside of spec.


This is getting complicated. I don't know what S/PDIF (the REAL
S/PDIF) actually supported, but the real AES/EBU only supports
(officially) 20 bits. What you describe is true for AES/EBU. There's a
channel status bit that tells the receiving device to interpret the
"spare" bits as audio.

IEC-958/II (the consumer version, which evolved from S/PDIF) has
always had 24 bits that can legally carry audio data. IEC-958/I (the
pro version, which evolved from AES/EBU) still defines 20 official
bits for audio data, and the other 4 bits of a 24-bit data stream are
carried elsewhere, with a clue to interpret them as audio.

ADAT, however, using the same plastic optical cable and connector,

always
supported 24 bit/48 kHz data transfer for 8 channels of data


The original ADAT optical interface only handled 20 bits, I believe
because of a limitation of their interface chip. (Garth?) It wasn't until
a generation or two later that it could carry 24 bits.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo



  #25   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The original ADATs were only 16 bit converters, as was the Tascam DA88.
Then Tascam came out with the DA38 with 18 bit converters and Alesis came
out with the ADAT XT, which had 20 bits but only recorded 16. Then the next
model that actually recorded 20 bits, then Tascam came out with 24 bit
recording from 24 bit converters. And then digital multitrack tape ended!
g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1087828126k@trad...

In article writes:

The original ADAT optical specification for which they filed for a U.S.
Patent in 1992 (and were granted 2 years later: #5,297,181) specifies
24 bit audio. You might remember Alesis ADAT "SVHS" was 16 bits, as was
Tascam "Hi-8" DTRS. Then recall that Alesis came out with their 20 bit
version of the ADAT tape machine, excusing themselves in the various
marketing literature for going all the way to 24 bits. This is probably
what you are remembering.


I remember the different models of ADAT, 16- and 20-bit. When the
DA-78 first came out, TASCAM made a big deal about how ("unlike the
ADAT") their interface has always been 24-bit-capable. While Alesis'
patent may have covered a 24-bit interface (certainly a smart thing to
do) it was my recollection that the original interface chips as built
would only pass 20-bit data - not a big deal with a 16-bit recorder.
It wasn't until later (maybe concurrent with the release of the 20-bit
ADAT recorder) that it handled 24 bits.

Their current interface chipset, the AL1401A and AL1402, does support 24
bits now.


No argument there.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo





  #26   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

http://www.mtsu.edu/~dsmitche/rim420...Interface.html
Here is a short comparision table of AES/EBU and S/PDIF interfaces:

AES/EBU S/PDIF (IEC-958)

Max. Resolution 24 bits 20 bits (24 bit optional)As
you can see, AES/EBU 24 bits, S/PDIF 20 bits as the original standard.


This part is backwards, at least according to my article in Recording.
Who're you gonna believe?

"Max resolution" is really kind of a bad way of describing the terms
of the standard. "number of bits in the audio data word" is better,
but they can't say that in 1/3 of a column of print. AES only has 20
bits in that chunk of data, and the other 4 bits are somewhere else.
The S/PDIF format doesn't really specify word length, but there's room
for 24 bits in that chunk.

Nothing really to argue about though. Everybody knows how to send a
24-bit audio word down the pipe, and find all the bits when it gets to
where it's going. With older systems, you had to watch out that the
receiver knew not to interpret those "extra" bits as what they're
supposed to be, but to pass them through as audio. There's a flag for
that. I can't remember what they are if they're not audio (it's
probably in my article) but it's something that's rarely missed.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
  #27   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, Mike, I'm going to believe Glenn Meadows, who told me the same
thing I was showing you. Or maybe Frank Wells, or Bob Katz. It's exactly
the way I remember it from 1992 when I bought my first digital tape
recorder. Now how it plays out internally, I don't know exactly, but
IEC958's original specs were 20 bits with 24 optional while AES was a full
24 bits. Now maybe my two brain cells aren't working together on this one,
but it was the way I remember it, and the quote was certainly a reliable
source.

But hey, I've been wrong before! g Well, I though I was, but I was
mistaken.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1087867424k@trad...

In article

writes:

http://www.mtsu.edu/~dsmitche/rim420...Interface.html
Here is a short comparision table of AES/EBU and S/PDIF interfaces:

AES/EBU S/PDIF (IEC-958)

Max. Resolution 24 bits 20 bits (24 bit

optional)As
you can see, AES/EBU 24 bits, S/PDIF 20 bits as the original standard.


This part is backwards, at least according to my article in Recording.
Who're you gonna believe?

"Max resolution" is really kind of a bad way of describing the terms
of the standard. "number of bits in the audio data word" is better,
but they can't say that in 1/3 of a column of print. AES only has 20
bits in that chunk of data, and the other 4 bits are somewhere else.
The S/PDIF format doesn't really specify word length, but there's room
for 24 bits in that chunk.

Nothing really to argue about though. Everybody knows how to send a
24-bit audio word down the pipe, and find all the bits when it gets to
where it's going. With older systems, you had to watch out that the
receiver knew not to interpret those "extra" bits as what they're
supposed to be, but to pass them through as audio. There's a flag for
that. I can't remember what they are if they're not audio (it's
probably in my article) but it's something that's rarely missed.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo



  #28   Report Post  
Roger W. Norman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, Mike, I'm going to believe Glenn Meadows, who told me the same
thing I was showing you. Or maybe Frank Wells, or Bob Katz. It's exactly
the way I remember it from 1992 when I bought my first digital tape
recorder. Now how it plays out internally, I don't know exactly, but
IEC958's original specs were 20 bits with 24 optional while AES was a full
24 bits. Now maybe my two brain cells aren't working together on this one,
but it was the way I remember it, and the quote was certainly a reliable
source.

But hey, I've been wrong before! g Well, I though I was, but I was
mistaken.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1087867424k@trad...

In article

writes:

http://www.mtsu.edu/~dsmitche/rim420...Interface.html
Here is a short comparision table of AES/EBU and S/PDIF interfaces:

AES/EBU S/PDIF (IEC-958)

Max. Resolution 24 bits 20 bits (24 bit

optional)As
you can see, AES/EBU 24 bits, S/PDIF 20 bits as the original standard.


This part is backwards, at least according to my article in Recording.
Who're you gonna believe?

"Max resolution" is really kind of a bad way of describing the terms
of the standard. "number of bits in the audio data word" is better,
but they can't say that in 1/3 of a column of print. AES only has 20
bits in that chunk of data, and the other 4 bits are somewhere else.
The S/PDIF format doesn't really specify word length, but there's room
for 24 bits in that chunk.

Nothing really to argue about though. Everybody knows how to send a
24-bit audio word down the pipe, and find all the bits when it gets to
where it's going. With older systems, you had to watch out that the
receiver knew not to interpret those "extra" bits as what they're
supposed to be, but to pass them through as audio. There's a flag for
that. I can't remember what they are if they're not audio (it's
probably in my article) but it's something that's rarely missed.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo



  #29   Report Post  
Matt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Mike) wrote in message . com...
(Matt) wrote in message . com...
ospam (WillStG) wrote in message ...
(Matt)


Do adat optical-ethernet interfaces exists? That would work with an
imac/pro tools LE setup? 'Twould be nice. Thanks.--MAtt





I'm looking for a way to interface 8 channels of audio I/O in the
format of ADAT optical with my imac.

You got your IMac 3 years ago, I highly doubt it has USB 2.0 so you ain't
likely to get 8 tracks in the puppy with a USB interface, USB 1.1 is just too
slow. You need to look at a Firewire interface, and if the IMac is so old it
doesn't have that you're priced out of the market with your $220 limitation.


My imac is a round based one with jaguar and 700mhz, this is not one
of those old multi-color models. It's the kind you could go to apple
today and buy. It most definitely has usb2.0. I've heard firewire is
faster but with my computer there jsut wont be that much difference
that its worth the extra pennies.


You *could* buy a Harmoni upgrade card for the Imac which gives older
Imacs firewire and a modest speed bump for $300, but then you need a firewire
device like the MOTU (around $800).


Believe me i would skip and optical interface and the connection to
the computer totally if i could just get a motu but as u said

MOTU (around $800)


that's why im not getting it.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits


If it isn't usb 2.0 it isn't an option at all. I think M-audio makes
the some pretty cheap firewire ones that have adat I/O.

Mike
http://www.mmeproductions.com
  #30   Report Post  
EggHd
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do adat optical-ethernet interfaces exists? That would work with an
imac/pro tools LE setup? 'Twould be nice. Thanks.--MAtt

Pro Tools only works with Digidesign hardware. The 002R has firewire and adat
optical (Lightpipe)



---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"


  #31   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

Do adat optical-ethernet interfaces exists?


Yes. See
http://www.audiorail.com

That would work with an
imac/pro tools LE setup?


No. ProTools must talk to Digidesign hardware.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOTU Pocket Express MIDI Interface Rare Old Things Marketplace 0 May 19th 04 04:29 AM
eBay: Mark of Unicorn 2 IN, 4 OUT, 32-channel MIDI/SMPTE interface Rare Old Things Marketplace 0 May 16th 04 03:24 PM
eBay: Mark of Unicorn 2 IN, 4 OUT, 32-channel MIDI/SMPTE interface Rare Old Things Marketplace 0 May 16th 04 03:24 PM
ADAT to laptop? Andrea Pro Audio 10 December 18th 03 07:26 PM
ALESIS ADAT RMB Meterbridge tobikukla Tech 0 September 26th 03 05:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"