Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of basic newbie questions for you: audio signals can get distorted
from either analog or digital recording levels being set too high. 1) Analog levels that are slightly too high can sound better than levels that are just under "max" input. Can speakers be damaged by playing analog signals that are more than slightly too high? 2) Digital signals that are too high at all instantly result in clipping and its characteristic crackling noise. Is there any danger of damage to speakers playing back recordings that were made with digital levels set too high? Or is the only downside the crackling noise? If a digital signal that clipped during recording is reduced in volume via software, will the crackling go away or must it be removed with a filtering program? 3) Does removing unwanted noise with filtering/cleaning programs degrade signal? Do they remove or alter anything other than the specific things that they are designed to remove (e.g., tape/mic hiss, pops from vinyl lp's, diginoise from DAE)? Do they resample or in any other way basically alter the source material? Thanks, Barton |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barton Bosch" wrote in message ... A couple of basic newbie questions for you: audio signals can get distorted from either analog or digital recording levels being set too high. 1) Analog levels that are slightly too high can sound better than levels that are just under "max" input. Can speakers be damaged by playing analog signals that are more than slightly too high? yes 2) Digital signals that are too high at all instantly result in clipping and its characteristic crackling noise. Is there any danger of damage to speakers playing back recordings that were made with digital levels set too high? Yes Or is the only downside the crackling noise? If a digital signal that clipped during recording is reduced in volume via software, will the crackling go away or must it be removed with a filtering program? You should *never* accept digital-clipped signals, or analogue ones, unless a fuzz-box. 3) Does removing unwanted noise with filtering/cleaning programs degrade signal? Yes Do they remove or alter anything other than the specific things that they are designed to remove (e.g., tape/mic hiss, pops from vinyl lp's, diginoise from DAE)? Do they resample or in any other way basically alter the source material? Yes. It is better not to have a problem in the first place, than to get a problem then try to fix it. geoff |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barton Bosch" wrote in message
A couple of basic newbie questions for you: audio signals can get distorted from either analog or digital recording levels being set too high. 1) Analog levels that are slightly too high can sound better than levels that are just under "max" input. Can speakers be damaged by playing analog signals that are more than slightly too high? Speakers can be damaged by any kind of signal that causes the voice coil travel or voice coil heat dissipation limits of the speaker to be exceeded. 2) Digital signals that are too high at all instantly result in clipping and its characteristic crackling noise. There is no appreciably difference between good analog clipping and good digital clipping. In both cases the signal is flat-topped, and that is that. There have been digital converters in the past that did not clip cleanly, but those can be viewed as analog domain problems. Is there any danger of damage to speakers playing back recordings that were made with digital levels set too high? Or is the only downside the crackling noise? See comments about speaker damage, above. If a digital signal that clipped during recording is reduced in volume via software, will the crackling go away or must it be removed with a filtering program? The cracking won't go away, and filtering programs will adversely affect sound quality. Whether in the analog domain or digital domain, the best rule is to not clip. 3) Does removing unwanted noise with filtering/cleaning programs degrade signal? Yes. Do they remove or alter anything other than the specific things that they are designed to remove (e.g., tape/mic hiss, pops from vinyl lp's, diginoise from DAE)? Of course they remove more than just the basic damage, although some of the better vinyl noise removal programs can have remarkably pleasing results. Do they resample or in any other way basically alter the source material? They definitely basically alter the source material while they remove the noise. As usual, there is no free lunch. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Engineer" wrote in message
Barton Bosch wrote: A couple of basic newbie questions for you: audio signals can get distorted from either analog or digital recording levels being set too high. 1) Analog levels that are slightly too high can sound better than levels that are just under "max" input. Not in my opinion. Any clipping, hard or soft, introduces odd harmonics and they sound very bad. Asymmetrical clipping generates zero odd harmonics. I f you clip a sine wave perfectly asymetrically, you get a DC offset and only even harmonics. If you want odd harmonics you must clip the waveform at least a little symmetrically. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barton Bosch" wrote in message ... Speakers can be damaged by any kind of signal that causes the voice coil travel or voice coil heat dissipation limits of the speaker to be exceeded. Could someone expand on what "any kind of signal" might include, other than the analog or digital distortion discussed in the first message. Would garden variety distorted rock guitar or thrash punk -- recorded with levels set properly and playback volume within reason for the given speaker/amp combination -- cause the voice coil to travel beyond its limit, or the speaker to heat up and burn out? Is there any technical difference in listening to Hendrix in comparison to, say, chamber music, where potential speaker damage is concerned? Moer possible than with the other, but only if you havew it ridiculously loud. What about the case where a digital signal is recorded (improperly, obviously) resulting in clipping and the characteristic crackling noise. That signal is then transferred to hard disk, reduced in volume, and then reburned to CD. The new disk no longer has levels which cause clipping distortion, but the crackling noise artifacts are still present (they weren't filtered out with a cleaning program, etc.). Am I correct in assuming that playing this new (signal lowered) recording of the original distorted source at a reasonable volume for the given stereo setup does not pose any particular danger to the speakers? Possibly not, but still will sound like ****. I understand that levels, particularly digital levels, should be set below saturation. I am not trying to start a feud about people's subjective preferences in setting analog recording levels a bit too high for extra presence. In the real world of live recording, things happen and you only have one chance to get things right. Or you can try to clean up someone's mistakes afterwards. I just want to base my actions on accurate information rather than my collected assumptions from a decade of messing around with consumer recording equipment. There is no rocket science in it - just don't get clipped in the first place. Then you needn't worry about it. geoff |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barton Bosch wrote:
Speakers can be damaged by any kind of signal that causes the voice coil travel or voice coil heat dissipation limits of the speaker to be exceeded. Could someone expand on what "any kind of signal" might include, other than the analog or digital distortion discussed in the first message. I personally have destroyed a set of speakers by playing the Saint Saens "Organ" Symphony at high volume. g Would garden variety distorted rock guitar or thrash punk -- recorded with levels set properly and playback volume within reason for the given speaker/amp combination -- cause the voice coil to travel beyond its limit, or the speaker to heat up and burn out? Is there any technical difference in listening to Hendrix in comparison to, say, chamber music, where potential speaker damage is concerned? What about the case where a digital signal is recorded (improperly, obviously) resulting in clipping and the characteristic crackling noise. That signal is then transferred to hard disk, reduced in volume, and then reburned to CD. The new disk no longer has levels which cause clipping distortion, but the crackling noise artifacts are still present (they weren't filtered out with a cleaning program, etc.). Am I correct in assuming that playing this new (signal lowered) recording of the original distorted source at a reasonable volume for the given stereo setup does not pose any particular danger to the speakers? I understand that levels, particularly digital levels, should be set below saturation. I am not trying to start a feud about people's subjective preferences in setting analog recording levels a bit too high for extra presence. In the real world of live recording, things happen and you only have one chance to get things right. Or you can try to clean up someone's mistakes afterwards. I just want to base my actions on accurate information rather than my collected assumptions from a decade of messing around with consumer recording equipment. Barton |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if your reply was intended as a troll or if you just missed the
"assuming a resonable playback volume for a given speaker/amp combination" statement in my message. Your advice to "keep the volume turned down for 'any signal' and your speakers will be fine holds for the general case," but in the case of a clipped signal the volume/output spikes, and what was an acceptable volume for the non-clipped portion of the signal quickly becomes hazardous to the speakers... A signal is not just a signal when it is clipped. Barton |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barton Bosch" wrote in message
I don't know if your reply was intended as a troll or if you just missed the "assuming a reasonable playback volume for a given speaker/amp combination" statement in my message. By definition, a "...reasonable playback volume for a given speaker/amp combination..." will never damage it. Your advice to "keep the volume turned down for 'any signal' and your speakers will be fine holds for the general case," but in the case of a clipped signal the volume/output spikes, and what was an acceptable volume for the non-clipped portion of the signal quickly becomes hazardous to the speakers... Clipping a signal heavily is obviously not a really *nice* thing to do to it, but just clipping a signal doesn't make it an instant destroyer of speakers. A signal is not just a signal when it is clipped. But in reality, it is. There's a lot of lore about clipped signals, like the idea that clipped signals always have more high frequency content, that just isn't true. The key consideration in any speaker damage situation is the nut holding the knob on the volume control. Saying "the clipped signal made me do it" is IME a cop-out. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
f.S. Tons of cheapgear | Pro Audio | |||
F.S. tons of gear for sale, keys, modules, pro audio, etc | Pro Audio | |||
F.S. tons of studio/keyboard/rack gear | Pro Audio | |||
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps | High End Audio | |||
fostex D2424LV simultaneous digital and analog recording ispossible | Pro Audio |