[ScottW]

Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence of
nonlinear distortion can result in positive perception from
most listeners?

ScottW

[[email protected]]

On Aug 12, 3:55?pm, "ScottW" wrote:
Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence of
nonlinear distortion can result in positive perception from
most listeners?

ScottW

GedLee? Like Geddy Lee?

Boon

[ScottW]

On Aug 12, 4:26 pm, wrote:
On Aug 12, 3:55?pm, "ScottW" wrote:

Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence of
nonlinear distortion can result in positive perception from
most listeners?

ScottW

GedLee? Like Geddy Lee?

Boon

Earl Geddes and Lidia Lee... science may rescue you
SET lovers yet .

ScottW

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message

Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence
of nonlinear distortion can result in positive perception
from most listeners?

The work indicates that the presence of enough nonlinear distortion of
certain kinds is audible.

[ScottW]

On Aug 12, 4:59 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message



Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence
of nonlinear distortion can result in positive perception
from most listeners?

The work indicates that the presence of enough nonlinear distortion of
certain kinds is audible.

"Psychoacoustical data were measured, correlation and regression
analysis were applied to examine the relationship and predictive value
of this new metric to the subjective assessment of sound quality of
nonlinear distortion. Furthermore, conventional metrics such as total
harmonic distortion (THD) and intermodulation distortion (IMD) were
also compared. "

I'm interested in the subjective assessment of sound quality.

ScottW

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message
oups.com
On Aug 12, 4:59 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message



Anyone of you AES readers seen this paper?

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12465

I was just wondering if this work indicates the presence
of nonlinear distortion can result in positive
perception from most listeners?

The work indicates that the presence of enough nonlinear
distortion of certain kinds is audible.

"Psychoacoustical data were measured, correlation and
regression analysis were applied to examine the
relationship and predictive value of this new metric to
the subjective assessment of sound quality of nonlinear
distortion. Furthermore, conventional metrics such as
total harmonic distortion (THD) and intermodulation
distortion (IMD) were also compared. "

I'm interested in the subjective assessment of sound
quality.

Why not obtain the paper?

Oh, it costs a few bucks from the AES.

You might find more free information at the Gedlee web site:

http://www.gedlee.com/