Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering how
many have tried them?

Also, I find it good to know that we no longer have to rely on Newtonian
Physics, they were getting in the way of a lot of brilliant people like
JUte/Munchausen/McCoy, so I say the hell with them.

Sorry, I must go now, I just got a call from Edgar Cayce and I must take
hear what he has to say.

wrote in message
ink.net...
Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering
how many have tried them?

Also, I find it good to know that we no longer have to rely on Newtonian
Physics, they were getting in the way of a lot of brilliant people like
JUte/Munchausen/McCoy, so I say the hell with them.

Sorry, I must go now, I just got a call from Edgar Cayce and I must take
hear what he has to say.
I have read Edgar Cayce's diagnosis of your condition. He calls it liatosis,
a foul exhudation of the mouth caused by telling too many lies. The
prescription is a quart of castor oil, taken by mouth, with every meal.

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...
:
: wrote in message
: ink.net...
: Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
: place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering
: how many have tried them?
:
: Also, I find it good to know that we no longer have to rely on Newtonian
: Physics, they were getting in the way of a lot of brilliant people like
: JUte/Munchausen/McCoy, so I say the hell with them.
:
: Sorry, I must go now, I just got a call from Edgar Cayce and I must take
: hear what he has to say.
: I have read Edgar Cayce's diagnosis of your condition. He calls it liatosis,
: a foul exhudation of the mouth caused by telling too many lies. The
: prescription is a quart of castor oil, taken by mouth, with every meal.
:
he, are you being harsh ? i distinctly remember that as "..every _other_ meal"

R.

wrote:
Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering how
many have tried them?


I wonder how SHP might want to tweak you? Hmmm... Please SHP old chap,
if anything needs tweaking in a quantum mechanics sort of a way, it's
this "thing" called nob, mcmoron, mickeymickmickey, duh!mikey, etc..
Like that Schrödinger's Cat, perhaps if we put him in a tightly sealed
box, with lots of decaying nitrogen 13 atoms and a hammer that hits him
in the head each time an atom decays, and wait for, not ten minutes, but
some ten decades, and open the box to see if he is still alive
afterwards... Whatyasay, shp ol chum? Wouldn't that tweak our
mickeyMcMoron good?

Or what if we knock him against a led wall a quadrillion times a
quadrillion times so as to find out when his atoms and the led wall's
atoms actually line up so that he passes (well his head anyway) through
the wall at least once. Though if and when that happens we can go on to
see when it'll happen again, yes? Awaiting your suggestions.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering
how many have tried them?


I wonder how SHP might want to tweak you? Hmmm... Please SHP old chap,
if anything needs tweaking in a quantum mechanics sort of a way, it's
this "thing" called nob, mcmoron, mickeymickmickey, duh!mikey, etc..
Like that Schrödinger's Cat, perhaps if we put him in a tightly sealed
box, with lots of decaying nitrogen 13 atoms and a hammer that hits him
in the head each time an atom decays, and wait for, not ten minutes, but
some ten decades, and open the box to see if he is still alive
afterwards... Whatyasay, shp ol chum? Wouldn't that tweak our
mickeyMcMoron good?

Or what if we knock him against a led wall a quadrillion times a
quadrillion times so as to find out when his atoms and the led wall's
atoms actually line up so that he passes (well his head anyway) through
the wall at least once. Though if and when that happens we can go on to
see when it'll happen again, yes? Awaiting your suggestions.

I think he'd likely give you the same advice as he gives everybody else, try
it for yourself first and see if works. It appears your head is in need of
some class anyway.

Fella wrote:

wrote:
Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wonderinghow
many have tried them?


I wonder how SHP might want to tweak you? Hmmm... Please SHP old chap,
if anything needs tweaking in a quantum mechanics sort of a way, it's
this "thing" called nob, mcmoron, mickeymickmickey, duh!mikey, etc..
Like that Schrödinger's Cat, perhaps if we put him in a tightly sealed
box, with lots of decaying nitrogen 13 atoms and a hammer that hits him
in the head each time an atom decays, and wait for, not ten minutes, but
some ten decades, and open the box to see if he is still alive
afterwards... Whatyasay, shp ol chum? Wouldn't that tweak our
mickeyMcMoron good?

Or what if we knock him against a led wall a quadrillion times a
quadrillion times so as to find out when his atoms and the led wall's
atoms actually line up so that he passes (well his head anyway) through
the wall at least once. Though if and when that happens we can go on to
see when it'll happen again, yes? Awaiting your suggestions.

Mike McKelvy? I'd stick him in a home made orgone energy generator and
see if nuclear contamination might smarten him up.

Fella wrote:
wrote:
Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wonderinghow
many have tried them?


I wonder how SHP might want to tweak you? Hmmm... Please SHP old chap,
if anything needs tweaking in a quantum mechanics sort of a way, it's
this "thing" called nob, mcmoron, mickeymickmickey, duh!mikey, etc..
Like that Schrödinger's Cat, perhaps if we put him in a tightly sealed
box, with lots of decaying nitrogen 13 atoms and a hammer that hits him
in the head each time an atom decays, and wait for, not ten minutes, but
some ten decades, and open the box to see if he is still alive
afterwards... Whatyasay, shp ol chum? Wouldn't that tweak our
mickeyMcMoron good?

Or what if we knock him against a led wall a quadrillion times a
quadrillion times so as to find out when his atoms and the led wall's
atoms actually line up so that he passes (well his head anyway) through
the wall at least once. Though if and when that happens we can go on to
see when it'll happen again, yes? Awaiting your suggestions.

Please, don't discourage him. Nyob trying for humour and
irony
is fun to watch.
Ludovic Mirabel

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

I don't know I thought there was nothing lower than Middius, and then up
pops Singh. Just when you think he's the bottom of the barrel, up pops
"Fella."

EddieM seems to have been excommunicated, so perhaps we've found out what
the standards are.
Sad.

From:
Date: Thurs, Mar 16 2006 5:39 pm
Email:

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

I don't know I thought there was nothing lower than Middius, and then up
pops Singh. Just when you think he's the bottom of the barrel, up pops
"Fella."

Here's another example of nob's 'contributions' to r.a.o.

Note that Mr. Middius has not posted to this thread as of the time of
nob's 'gratuitous' attack. Poor nob! r.a.o. is a wasteland of personal
attacks! And it's not *his* fault...

Sad.

I agree. Now put your pecker back in your pants, OK? What would your
kids think if they accidentally walked in and saw you like this?

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thurs, Mar 16 2006 5:39 pm
Email:

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

I don't know I thought there was nothing lower than Middius, and then up
pops Singh. Just when you think he's the bottom of the barrel, up pops
"Fella."

Here's another example of nob's 'contributions' to r.a.o.

Note that Mr. Middius has not posted to this thread as of the time of
nob's 'gratuitous' attack. Poor nob! r.a.o. is a wasteland of personal
attacks! And it's not *his* fault...

Sad.

I agree. Now put your pecker back in your pants, OK? What would your
kids think if they accidentally walked in and saw you like this?

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thurs, Mar 16 2006 5:39 pm
Email:

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

I don't know I thought there was nothing lower than Middius, and then up
pops Singh. Just when you think he's the bottom of the barrel, up pops
"Fella."

Here's another example of nob's 'contributions' to r.a.o.

Note that Mr. Middius has not posted to this thread as of the time of
nob's 'gratuitous' attack. Poor nob! r.a.o. is a wasteland of personal
attacks! And it's not *his* fault...

Nor yours either, I suppose.

That wasn't an attack, it was a comment based on observation.

Sad.

I agree. Now put your pecker back in your pants, OK? What would your
kids think if they accidentally walked in and saw you like this?

It always comes down to some sort of sexual thing for you, doesn't it?

From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17 2006 2:20 am
Email:

Note that Mr. Middius has not posted to this thread as of the time of
nob's 'gratuitous' attack. Poor nob! r.a.o. is a wasteland of personal
attacks! And it's not *his* fault...

Nor yours either, I suppose.

A subtle difference: you don't see me whining about it.

If you whine about something, while being one of the most egregious
offenders, you are a hypocrite.

It always comes down to some sort of sexual thing for you, doesn't it?

I have no idea what this relates to. Where have I 'always' referred to
sex? Enlighten me.

From: Arny Krueger
Date: Thurs, Mar 16 2006 4:50 pm
Email: "Arny Krueger"

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

This is an utterly useless statement, no better than cheap political
propaganda. You want to talk about 'excluded middle' arguments?

This assumes that all 'subjectivists' agree that the tweaks proposed by
Soundhaspriority are valid and useful. Clearly not all do.

I am, I suppose, a 'subjectivist' but I hardly buy the thought that the
tweaks proposed are valid or even worthy of trying. This last one looks
potentially dangerous to me, at least as far as equipment life is
concerned.

Perhaps I've misunderstood some of the posts I've seen from
'objectivists.' Perhaps the 'objectivists' never actually disagree on
anything and they all proceed in lock-step with one another. I hadn't
thought that to be the case.

I think that trying to pigeonhole either group in such a manner is
counterproductive at best and extremely intellectually dishonest at
worst. The political equivalent is saying that all Democrats are Ted
Kennedy disciples and that all republicans are Pat Robertson disciples
(while that is probably more true for republicans, not ALL republicans
are crazed religious whacko neo-nazis. Just most...).

Those silly 'objectivists.' They all lie and then try to get everybody
to agree with their distorted sense of reality.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:


This assumes that all 'subjectivists' agree that the tweaks proposed by
Soundhaspriority are valid and useful. Clearly not all do.

Did I miss something? By "not all", who here are you implying does?

I am, I suppose, a 'subjectivist' but I hardly buy the thought that the
tweaks proposed are valid or even worthy of trying.

Yet you have no evidence that they aren't valid or worthy of trying.
Which proves that you're really no different than Arny, who also
mistakenly believes that the only valid things in audio are those that
conform to his flawed thinking. The rest can be casually dismissed
without trial. With qualifications like that, don't pretend you are a
"subjectivist". At best, you're what Arny calls himself: "a reliable
subjectivist".

This last one looks
potentially dangerous to me, at least as far as equipment life is
concerned.

Same ignorant thing that Arny said. Are you sure you're not him? As for
the speaker grounding tweak, not only have I tested it, I've already
given examples of commecial models that incorporate the grounding.
Plus, I've made several offers for people to come and observe my
speaker setup, where I show the speakers being grounded as described,
and the amp working perfectly. That's more evidence I'm supplying than
you've ever shown for any of your false assertions about everything.


Perhaps I've misunderstood some of the posts I've seen from
'objectivists.' Perhaps the 'objectivists' never actually disagree on
anything and they all proceed in lock-step with one another. I hadn't
thought that to be the case.

I've certainly proved it to be the case with subjectivists. Unless you
can come up with one example, that I've asked you for above.


I think that trying to pigeonhole either group in such a manner is
counterproductive at best and extremely intellectually dishonest at
worst.

The exception is what I've said here. What Arny said is worthless, but
that describes just about everything he says. But if it's actually
true, it can't be _reasonably_ disproven (among those who listen to
reason).

Those silly 'objectivists.' They all lie and then try to get everybody
to agree with their distorted sense of reality.

I've already proven that both of you ideologues do that. You ALL reside
under a distorted sense of reality. At least in relation to audio; if
not many other things.

This assumes that all 'subjectivists' agree that the tweaks proposed by
Soundhaspriority are valid and useful. Clearly not all do.

Did I miss something? By "not all", who here are you implying does?

I'm not implying that anybody does.

I am, I suppose, a 'subjectivist' but I hardly buy the thought that the
tweaks proposed are valid or even worthy of trying.

Yet you have no evidence that they aren't valid or worthy of trying.
Which proves that you're really no different than Arny, who also
mistakenly believes that the only valid things in audio are those that
conform to his flawed thinking. The rest can be casually dismissed
without trial. With qualifications like that, don't pretend you are a
"subjectivist". At best, you're what Arny calls himself: "a reliable
subjectivist".

No, the difference between the 'usual suspects' and me is that I do not
care if you want to use tweaks. I personally do not think it worth the
time, but if you do, go for it. I am not, and have not, tried to
convince anybody one way or another.

If you are trying to force me to do trials in order to dismiss an idea
that I personally do not agree with or find worthy (conforming to your
thoughts), then it is you who are most like Arny between the two of us.
I will not try to force you to do DBTs any more than I would try to
force Arny to try your tweaks.

You are, however, making Arny's argument for him: that all
'subjectivists' can be pigeonholed into a group.

This last one looks
potentially dangerous to me, at least as far as equipment life is
concerned.

Same ignorant thing that Arny said. Are you sure you're not him? As for
the speaker grounding tweak, not only have I tested it, I've already
given examples of commecial models that incorporate the grounding.
Plus, I've made several offers for people to come and observe my
speaker setup, where I show the speakers being grounded as described,
and the amp working perfectly. That's more evidence I'm supplying than
you've ever shown for any of your false assertions about everything.

If it works for your setup, great. I thought you were stating that it
would work for all setups. My mistake.

Perhaps I've misunderstood some of the posts I've seen from
'objectivists.' Perhaps the 'objectivists' never actually disagree on
anything and they all proceed in lock-step with one another. I hadn't
thought that to be the case.

I've certainly proved it to be the case with subjectivists. Unless you
can come up with one example, that I've asked you for above.

So you actually *are* an objectivist and this is a simple troll. Things
make much more sense now.

I think that trying to pigeonhole either group in such a manner is
counterproductive at best and extremely intellectually dishonest at
worst.

The exception is what I've said here. What Arny said is worthless, but
that describes just about everything he says. But if it's actually
true, it can't be _reasonably_ disproven (among those who listen to
reason).

Something can be true for you and not true for others.

Those silly 'objectivists.' They all lie and then try to get everybody
to agree with their distorted sense of reality.

I've already proven that both of you ideologues do that. You ALL reside
under a distorted sense of reality. At least in relation to audio; if
not many other things.

And I've lied? Please show me where. If something is not true for me,
then it is not true for me. If something is true for you, then it is
true for you. Your tweaks work for you. You believe that they make your
system sound better. I do not wish to try them. I have no problem with
that. Why do you?

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

From: Arny Krueger
Date: Thurs, Mar 16 2006 4:50 pm
Email: "Arny Krueger"

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?


This is an utterly useless statement, no better than cheap political
propaganda. You want to talk about 'excluded middle' arguments?


Arny is a typical "demagog leader" of the borg.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

That any do is a sad statement.

That there are markets at all for things like $400.00 volumen knobs or that
some people have cryogenicly frozen their cables or believe that the
construction of their component rack has anything to do with the sound of
anything other than the turntable, or that soem people beleive that lifting
cables off the floor improves the sound, or replacing a stock power cord
with a 250.00 one will change anything. There's quite a market for snake
oil.

wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

That any do is a sad statement.

That there are markets at all for things like $400.00 volumen knobs or that
some people have cryogenicly frozen their cables or believe that the
construction of their component rack has anything to do with the sound of
anything other than the turntable, or that soem people beleive that lifting
cables off the floor improves the sound, or replacing a stock power cord
with a 250.00 one will change anything. There's quite a market for snake
oil.

Show proof that all of those items are fraudulent. Otherwise, you're
making a sad statement about your ignorance, and that of all
objectivists who denounce everything they don't understand and have
never tested, as "snake oil".

wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless
than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

That any do is a sad statement.

That there are markets at all for things like $400.00 volumen knobs or
that
some people have cryogenicly frozen their cables or believe that the
construction of their component rack has anything to do with the sound of
anything other than the turntable, or that soem people beleive that
lifting
cables off the floor improves the sound, or replacing a stock power cord
with a 250.00 one will change anything. There's quite a market for snake
oil.

Show proof that all of those items are fraudulent. Otherwise, you're
making a sad statement about your ignorance, and that of all
objectivists who denounce everything they don't understand and have
never tested, as "snake oil".

Request for proof of a negative, is proof that there is no proof to be
offered.

In article .net,
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than
it
was. How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

That any do is a sad statement.

I agree.

Jenn said:

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not all
"subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

That any do is a sad statement.

I agree.

The difference being that Mickey actually believes somebody does take
those alleged "tweaks" seriously. Only Krooger is krazy enough to do
that, but Mr. ****'s religion is completely hostile to this kind of
inanity.

From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17 2006 2:24 am
Email:

That there are markets at all for things like $400.00 volumen knobs or that
some people have cryogenicly frozen their cables or believe that the
construction of their component rack has anything to do with the sound of
anything other than the turntable, or that soem people beleive that lifting
cables off the floor improves the sound, or replacing a stock power cord
with a 250.00 one will change anything. There's quite a market for snake
oil.

All of this may or may not be true.

Either way, how does any of this effect you again? (IOW, who cares?)

Oh. I forgot. You're the self-appointed Savior.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17 2006 2:24 am
Email:

That there are markets at all for things like $400.00 volumen knobs or
that
some people have cryogenicly frozen their cables or believe that the
construction of their component rack has anything to do with the sound of
anything other than the turntable, or that soem people beleive that
lifting
cables off the floor improves the sound, or replacing a stock power cord
with a 250.00 one will change anything. There's quite a market for snake
oil.

All of this may or may not be true.

Either way, how does any of this effect you again? (IOW, who cares?)

Oh. I forgot. You're the self-appointed Savior.

Well we have that in common then.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried
them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even
more useless than it was. How low can the so-called
subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy tweeks Jenn. Not!

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message


In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


wrote in message
thlink.net


Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried
them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even
more useless than it was. How low can the so-called
subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.


I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy tweeks Jenn. Not!



Jenn Jenn, you've been neglecting your duties in the eyes of the great
kroog Jenn. What have you done for the great kroog today Jenn?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried
them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even
more useless than it was. How low can the so-called
subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy tweeks Jenn. Not!

Avoidance of my point noted.

I don't comment on everything with which I agree or disagree if others
are doing so and I have nothing new to add.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short,
has classed up the place by giving everybody who want
them free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have
tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even
more useless than it was. How low can the so-called
subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy
tweeks Jenn. Not!

Avoidance of my point noted.

It's just an unsupported claim. What is there of substance to avoid?

I don't comment on everything with which I agree or
disagree if others are doing so and I have nothing new to
add.

That's the coward's road - it suits you well.

Jenn said:

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy tweeks Jenn. Not!

I don't comment on everything with which I agree or disagree if others
are doing so and I have nothing new to add.

Jenn, you can't debug Kroologic with rules of normative human behavior.
Sorry.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried
them?

Nobody with a brain.

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even
more useless than it was. How low can the so-called
subjectivists go?

Way to put people into groups and judge them, Arny. Not
all "subjectivists" take those kind of tweaks seriously.

I've noticed your many denounciations of SHP's crazy tweeks Jenn. Not!


maybe she is merely ignoring the troll.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Arny Krueger exemplifies irony:

wrote in message
ink.net

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has
classed up the place by giving everybody who want them
free tweaks, I'm just wondering how many have tried them?

Nobody with a brain.

I say its the exact opposite reason. If you have a brain as you allege,
then why can't you show evidence that you do by proving the tweaks
don't work? As you would ask "the subs" to do when they make stupid
unfounded assertions? Out of the entire newsgroup dismissing them, not
one "brain" here has been able to do that. Are YOU smart enough to do
that, Arny? Or are you just talking out of your ass like everyone else?
In fact, you've never even tried it so who are you to talk, and how are
you supposed to know they don't work, even in practice?

It is hard to believe, but this place is getting even more useless than it
was.

Do you think it'll ever get more useless than you are? And does that
mean you'll be announcing your retirement from RAO in 10 years?

How low can the so-called subjectivists go?

I think they might have a ways to go before they get to your level of
glibly accusing a multitude of innocent people of trafficking in child
pornography.

From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17 2006 1:19 am
Email:

I say its the exact opposite reason. If you have a brain as you allege,
then why can't you show evidence that you do by proving the tweaks
don't work?

You are an 'objectivist' troll.

'nuff said.

wrote:

Now that SHP, (can we call you that) or S for short, has classed up the
place by giving everybody who want them free tweaks, I'm just wondering how
many have tried them?

I have made the observation that all of those who are ignorant
closed-minded mindless sheep are unwilling to try new ideas, or even
consider trying new ideas (n.b. almost none of the tweaks I posed are
new ideas. I define "new" as simply something people are not familiar
with). In fact, the mockery of my tweaks that people have tried to
assault me with proves that RAO regulars are too stupid to even tell
valid new ideas from silly bogus ones that they pull out of the toilet
(of their mind). Trying to make the inane point that anything that
sounds silly to them, is just as valid. And that any concept that
ignorant backward trailer-trash slack-jawed witless yokels (which breed
like crabgrass on this newsgroup) don't understand, isn't valid.
Therefore, the cretinous bigoted moron of RAO always predetermines that
he does not need to understand something that he didn't already know.
"All's he needs to know is" that "it ain't worth a crap in th' woods",
if he can't understand why it would work. The primitive thinker of RAO
won't ever be able to turn off the intellectual switch and do an end
run around the theoretical hurdle, in order to see whether any of the
tweaks have merit, before dismissing them out of hand. And if people
are ridiculing it, then the RAO lemming says "It must be something
worth ridiculing. I'll do that too!".

So to answer your query, those RAO members who are truly intelligent
(as opposed to simply educated), independently minded, and don't fit
the description above have tried the tweaks. Or in other words, sorry
no, nobody on this group has tried them. At least, nobody that is
willing to admit it to me. George "Morc from Orc" Middius made a tiny
little bird peep about the fact that he did try the aspirin with cat
tweak, but when I tried to query him about how he'd applied it, he shut
up about it. Because after later seeing how much ridicule he was in
for, he now "conveniently" distances himself from that earlier
statement. But then, you can't really blame George for that, because
he's an intrinsic coward.

Also, I find it good to know that we no longer have to rely on Newtonian
Physics, they were getting in the way of a lot of brilliant people like
JUte/Munchausen/McCoy, so I say the hell with them.

No you mindless arrogant oaf, no one said Newtonian physics need not
apply any longer. I don't know any of the people you just named, but
I've seen enough of what kind of mindless dross you spew. And I can say
with confidence, I'm sure they're leagues more "brilliant" than you
could hope to be.

Sorry, I must go now, I just got a call from Edgar Cayce and I must take
hear what he has to say.

I'll save you the suspense. I spoke to him beforehand. He also said
that you're a moron, Mike.

Shovels is still smarting from last week's rebuff.

George "Morc from Orc" Middius made a tiny
little bird peep about the fact that he did try the aspirin with cat
tweak, but when I tried to query him about how he'd applied it, he shut
up about it.

Poor Shovels. Did I let you down too roughly? I'll tell you anything you
want to know about my little experiment with your recipe. Ask away.

On 16 Mar 2006 15:44:30 -0800, wrote:

ignorant closed-minded mindless sheep
RAO regulars are too stupid
valid new ideas from silly bogus ones that they pull out of the toilet
(of their mind).
any concept that ignorant backward trailer-trash slack-jawed witless yokels (which breed
like crabgrass on this newsgroup)
Therefore, the cretinous bigoted moron of RAO
The primitive thinker of RAO
the RAO lemming

High praise indeed!

(Incidentally, what are closed-minded mindless sheep?)

paul packer wrote:

On 16 Mar 2006 15:44:30 -0800, wrote:

ignorant closed-minded mindless sheep
RAO regulars are too stupid
valid new ideas from silly bogus ones that they pull out of the toilet
(of their mind).
any concept that ignorant backward trailer-trash slack-jawed witless yokels (which breed
like crabgrass on this newsgroup)
Therefore, the cretinous bigoted moron of RAO
The primitive thinker of RAO
the RAO lemming

High praise indeed!

(Incidentally, what are closed-minded mindless sheep?)

I'm sure I have NO idea. That's just what the insult-o-meter (c) came
up with.
It's kind of outdated (early 50's model). I suppose it does need a
software upgrade.

On 16 Mar 2006 17:34:20 -0800, wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On 16 Mar 2006 15:44:30 -0800, wrote:

ignorant closed-minded mindless sheep
RAO regulars are too stupid
valid new ideas from silly bogus ones that they pull out of the toilet
(of their mind).
any concept that ignorant backward trailer-trash slack-jawed witless yokels (which breed
like crabgrass on this newsgroup)
Therefore, the cretinous bigoted moron of RAO
The primitive thinker of RAO
the RAO lemming

High praise indeed!

(Incidentally, what are closed-minded mindless sheep?)

I'm sure I have NO idea. That's just what the insult-o-meter (c) came
up with.
It's kind of outdated (early 50's model). I suppose it does need a
software upgrade.

And perhaps not only it.

paul packer wrote:
On 16 Mar 2006 15:44:30 -0800, wrote:

ignorant closed-minded mindless sheep
RAO regulars are too stupid
valid new ideas from silly bogus ones that they pull out of the toilet
(of their mind).
any concept that ignorant backward trailer-trash slack-jawed witless yokels (which breed
like crabgrass on this newsgroup)
Therefore, the cretinous bigoted moron of RAO
The primitive thinker of RAO
the RAO lemming

High praise indeed!

(Incidentally, what are closed-minded mindless sheep?)

very zen, if nothing else.
___
-S
"Excuse me? What solid proof do you have that I'm insane?" - soundhaspriority

Sillybot, don't you have sinewaves to measure?

(Incidentally, what are closed-minded mindless sheep?)

very zen, if nothing else.

Spake Sillybot: "I know all about zen cause I read it in a book, in
college, where I don't go now because I'm all grown up."


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


"Please pass the oil can before my brain rusts." -- Sillybot