Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello all!
I'm looking at the Event Studio Precision 8's to replace my current Berhinger Truth (don't ask) monitors. I already have a nice Hafler amp that puts out about 125w/ch and I don't mix at high levels as a rule. I also have a Samson amp that puts out around 150w/ch and to be honest I don't hear any difference between it and the Hafler although the build quality of the Hafler is much better. I know Samson has a miserable reputation, but....... So my question is, should I go with the Event actives @ $1,100/pair on sale at GC or go with the passives @ about $650/pair at Swee****er (I think that price is a wee bit high!). Thoughts? Anything else I should consider at the $1500 and below price point? Steph |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephanie" wrote in message
... Hello all! I'm looking at the Event Studio Precision 8's to replace my current Berhinger Truth (don't ask) monitors. I already have a nice Hafler amp that puts out about 125w/ch and I don't mix at high levels as a rule. I also have a Samson amp that puts out around 150w/ch and to be honest I don't hear any difference between it and the Hafler although the build quality of the Hafler is much better. I know Samson has a miserable reputation, but....... So my question is, should I go with the Event actives @ $1,100/pair on sale at GC or go with the passives @ about $650/pair at Swee****er (I think that price is a wee bit high!). I have an older set of the 20/20 BAS, and I love for listening and home theater, but there's been a lot posts pointing out that the mixes don't translate well to other speakers, and I have to agree with them. My mixes just don't sound right anywhere but my own room (which also needs better treatment, probably true for most rooms). I'm looking at Blue Sky and Truth Audio for my next set. I was hoping to get a set of Dynaudios, but the budget is slipping away for them. Sean |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:46:51 -0500, Sean Conolly wrote:
I have an older set of the 20/20 BAS, and I love for listening and home theater, but there's been a lot posts pointing out that the mixes don't translate well to other speakers, and I have to agree with them. My mixes just don't sound right anywhere but my own room (which also needs better treatment, probably true for most rooms). I'm looking at Blue Sky and Truth Audio for my next set. I was hoping to get a set of Dynaudios, but the budget is slipping away for them. Sean Hello Sean! I actually auditioned a set of 20/20 BAS's and I did not like them. The low end is hyped and flutters about, very loose sounding. Playing a Ray Brown CD on them drives the woofers wild! The Precision 8's (at least the active models which are the only ones I have heard) sound VERY different from the 20/20;s. FWIW they sound a lot like the Mackies only they go lower and the imaging seems a wee bit better, maybe at the expense of smoothness though IMHO. The SP8's sound much more controlled than the 20/20's to my ears. I love the Mackies, but we are talking $500.00 difference (actives) in price and quite frankly *I* don't hear $500.00 worth. But that's why I am asking for some professional opinions!! FWIW Dynaudio has a couple of models in my price frame. Any suggestions? Steph |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephanie" wrote in message
... On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:46:51 -0500, Sean Conolly wrote: I have an older set of the 20/20 BAS, and I love for listening and home theater, but there's been a lot posts pointing out that the mixes don't translate well to other speakers, and I have to agree with them. My mixes just don't sound right anywhere but my own room (which also needs better treatment, probably true for most rooms). I'm looking at Blue Sky and Truth Audio for my next set. I was hoping to get a set of Dynaudios, but the budget is slipping away for them. Sean Hello Sean! I actually auditioned a set of 20/20 BAS's and I did not like them. The low end is hyped and flutters about, very loose sounding. Playing a Ray Brown CD on them drives the woofers wild! The Precision 8's (at least the active models which are the only ones I have heard) sound VERY different from the 20/20;s. FWIW they sound a lot like the Mackies only they go lower and the imaging seems a wee bit better, maybe at the expense of smoothness though IMHO. The SP8's sound much more controlled than the 20/20's to my ears. I love the Mackies, but we are talking $500.00 difference (actives) in price and quite frankly *I* don't hear $500.00 worth. The oft-reported problem with the 20/20's seems to be a scooped midrange and hyped high end. And yes, the bottom gets loose, much more so than the Mackies. To my not-so-experienced ears the Mackies don't sound as good in the mids as my Events, but I couldn't tell you which one is closer to reality. None of which addresses the model you're looking at, which I haen't heard. I know that I'm not interested in using Events for my primary monitors anymore. But that's why I am asking for some professional opinions!! FWIW Dynaudio has a couple of models in my price frame. Any suggestions? I was going to go all out for the BM15A's, which I think would be the last monitors I would need for a long time, and at $2600 a pair they would need to. I'm probably going to spend closer to $1500 on speakers and put $1000 into room treatment. The BM6A is closer to that budget, and I can add a subwoofer later. I do want to listen to the Truth Audios and the Blue Sky's Sytem One first, though. I heard the little Blue Sky MediaDesk system and I was surprised how good it sounded, espcially how well the sub integrated with the desk speakers. Sean |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Blue Sky's (sys 1) work for me and all of my clients so far anyways. Very
smooth integration of the sub. Highly reccomended Rick@ Record Time Productions "Sean Conolly" wrote in message . .. "Stephanie" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:46:51 -0500, Sean Conolly wrote: I have an older set of the 20/20 BAS, and I love for listening and home theater, but there's been a lot posts pointing out that the mixes don't translate well to other speakers, and I have to agree with them. My mixes just don't sound right anywhere but my own room (which also needs better treatment, probably true for most rooms). I'm looking at Blue Sky and Truth Audio for my next set. I was hoping to get a set of Dynaudios, but the budget is slipping away for them. Sean Hello Sean! I actually auditioned a set of 20/20 BAS's and I did not like them. The low end is hyped and flutters about, very loose sounding. Playing a Ray Brown CD on them drives the woofers wild! The Precision 8's (at least the active models which are the only ones I have heard) sound VERY different from the 20/20;s. FWIW they sound a lot like the Mackies only they go lower and the imaging seems a wee bit better, maybe at the expense of smoothness though IMHO. The SP8's sound much more controlled than the 20/20's to my ears. I love the Mackies, but we are talking $500.00 difference (actives) in price and quite frankly *I* don't hear $500.00 worth. The oft-reported problem with the 20/20's seems to be a scooped midrange and hyped high end. And yes, the bottom gets loose, much more so than the Mackies. To my not-so-experienced ears the Mackies don't sound as good in the mids as my Events, but I couldn't tell you which one is closer to reality. None of which addresses the model you're looking at, which I haen't heard. I know that I'm not interested in using Events for my primary monitors anymore. But that's why I am asking for some professional opinions!! FWIW Dynaudio has a couple of models in my price frame. Any suggestions? I was going to go all out for the BM15A's, which I think would be the last monitors I would need for a long time, and at $2600 a pair they would need to. I'm probably going to spend closer to $1500 on speakers and put $1000 into room treatment. The BM6A is closer to that budget, and I can add a subwoofer later. I do want to listen to the Truth Audios and the Blue Sky's Sytem One first, though. I heard the little Blue Sky MediaDesk system and I was surprised how good it sounded, espcially how well the sub integrated with the desk speakers. Sean |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I already have a nice Hafler amp that puts out about 125w/ch and I
don't mix at high levels as a rule. I also have a Samson amp that puts out around 150w/ch and to be honest I don't hear any difference between it and the Hafler what speakers did you use to compare the two? (if they did not show any difference how good are they for mixing?) and what was your sound source ? (was it a mp3, no real details) active speakers have the advantage of having the amp / speaker interface tweaked to provide the best sound possible.(of course there are manufacurer's retail price considerations) but if something goes wrong everything must go to the repair shop. with seperates you can do an upgrade one component at a time. look into the dynaudio or pmc passive speakers, spend the $1100, the hafler should be good enough to start with either http://www.macmidimusic.com/level.itml/icOid/98 dale |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 04:30:27 -0800, dale wrote:
what speakers did you use to compare the two? (if they did not show any difference how good are they for mixing?) and what was your sound source ? (was it a mp3, no real details) See my reply to Mike, I should have been clearer. Using a mixture of sounds, no mp3 and at normal levels. Pushing things I can hear the differences and on my living room maggies I can hear the difference for the short time I tried it. active speakers have the advantage of having the amp / speaker interface tweaked to provide the best sound possible.(of course there are manufacurer's retail price considerations) but if something goes wrong everything must go to the repair shop. with seperates you can do an upgrade one component at a time. Good point! look into the dynaudio or pmc passive speakers, spend the $1100, the hafler should be good enough to start with either http://www.macmidimusic.com/level.itml/icOid/98 dale Thank you for the link it is very helpful! Steph |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephanie wrote:
I'm looking at the Event Studio Precision 8's to replace my current Berhinger Truth (don't ask) monitors. I already have a nice Hafler amp that puts out about 125w/ch and I don't mix at high levels as a rule. I also have a Samson amp that puts out around 150w/ch and to be honest I don't hear any difference between it and the Hafler although the build quality of the Hafler is much better. I know Samson has a miserable reputation, but....... That right there is a sign that you have a problem with your monitoring. With better speakers, you should be hearing a difference between amps. The difference between amps, though, will be a lot less than the diffference between speakers. So my question is, should I go with the Event actives @ $1,100/pair on sale at GC or go with the passives @ about $650/pair at Swee****er (I think that price is a wee bit high!). I see no reason to pay more money for active monitors if you have an amp set up already anyway. Anything else I should consider at the $1500 and below price point? I'm not a fan of the Events at all. I think you should definitely check out the Tannoy Reveals. And the Mackie active monitors aren't bad at all and might be in your range. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephanie" wrote in message
Hello all! I'm looking at the Event Studio Precision 8's to replace my current Berhinger Truth (don't ask) monitors. In all seriousness, why can't we ask? What don't you like about the little Behrs - it might give a clue about what the next step should be. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:07:38 -0500, Arny Krueger wrote:
"Stephanie" wrote in message Hello all! I'm looking at the Event Studio Precision 8's to replace my current Berhinger Truth (don't ask) monitors. In all seriousness, why can't we ask? What don't you like about the little Behrs - it might give a clue about what the next step should be. I have the Truth B2031's and I find the highs to be way too forward on them and the lows to be hyped. While I have learned to adjust for this over the time I have been using them I find them fatiguing to listen to for extended periods of time even when just playing commercial CD's for background music. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephanie,
should I go with the Event actives I never get into discussion about "which speaker is best," but I can offer my standard blurb on the advantage of active versus passive loudspeakers: There are many advantages of active monitors for the typical project studio, besides a simpler hookup with less pieces to carry if you ever do remotes: Active speakers are typically bi-amped, which often yields a cleaner sound with less distortion. And bi-amping offers more ways to optimize the crossover performance because it uses active rather than passive components. Also, the power amps will be well matched to the speakers, they won't have a fan, and the wires from amp to speaker are shorter which improves damping. But to me the overwhelming advantage, as implemented in the Mackies anyway, is that the woofer cone's motion can be included within the power amp's feedback loop to reduce distortion by a significant amount. --Ethan |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:34:34 -0500, Ethan Winer wrote:
Stephanie, should I go with the Event actives I never get into discussion about "which speaker is best," but I can offer my standard blurb on the advantage of active versus passive loudspeakers: There are many advantages of active monitors for the typical project studio, besides a simpler hookup with less pieces to carry if you ever do remotes: Active speakers are typically bi-amped, which often yields a cleaner sound with less distortion. And bi-amping offers more ways to optimize the crossover performance because it uses active rather than passive components. Also, the power amps will be well matched to the speakers, they won't have a fan, and the wires from amp to speaker are shorter which improves damping. But to me the overwhelming advantage, as implemented in the Mackies anyway, is that the woofer cone's motion can be included within the power amp's feedback loop to reduce distortion by a significant amount. --Ethan Thank you Ethan, that makes a lot of sense! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recommended budget active monitors? | Pro Audio | |||
Crossover efficiency - passive vs active. | Tech | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio | |||
KRK Studio Monitors for a Desktop (Nearfields Passive and Active) | Pro Audio | |||
best active monitors <£500 ? | Pro Audio |