Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I play the sax and would love to have a mic with a boost switch that I can press when I take a solo. This could simply be a 10 db pad in the normal case which is removed when the switch is pressed. Just a few resistors and a switch. Does anyone make such a device? It could even be built into an xlr shell.
Bob |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/04/2015 2:51 p.m., wrote:
I play the sax and would love to have a mic with a boost switch that I can press when I take a solo. This could simply be a 10 db pad in the normal case which is removed when the switch is pressed. Just a few resistors and a switch. Does anyone make such a device? It could even be built into an xlr shell. Bob More like a switchable pad with an in-out switch... http://lmgtfy.com/?q=switchable+balanced+pad+xlr HOSA do a switched oneone. But do you have a friendly sound-man, or is your mix preset ? Or you could play more subtly in the non-solo bits maybe ? Unless you wanna be like Springsteen's ex, and go full-blast 100% of the time (well the times I've noticed at least). geoff |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
skrev i en meddelelse
... I play the sax and would love to have a mic with a boost switch that I can press when I take a solo. It is called practicing and learning to play your instrument. Amplification does not change its tone, player dynamics do. Dynamics also apply to the other musicians in the ensemble. Stop being lazy and thinking that technology can and should do all for you for you all. You job as musicians is to balance, the technology's job is if applicable can be to add carry. Bob Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter
Why so combative over a simple proposal? I've played Jazz for 40 years and know how to use dynamics. The PA will sound cleaner if my mic is turned down most of the time except when I need it. That way it's not picking up all the other instruments. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
skrev i en meddelelse
... Peter Please use a proper usenet client, Netscape 4.7 is good if you can find it and please quote properly. Why so combative over a simple proposal? Because you are in my professionel opinion plain wrong. Some of the time being direct sounds blunt, I'm sorry. I've played Jazz for 40 years and know how to use dynamics. Then do it. Forget the PA is there. Play as if it isn't there. 10 dB of gain riding is just a plain annoyance, it is absurdly too much, 0.2 to 4 dB might be correct to focus or it might not depending on whether it is first set or third and the audience is half drunk and more noisy. The actual increments used in real mixing can be surprisingly small and some of the time it is just a tweak of a tone control instead of fader movement. That is not something you can replace with a 10 dB stomp box and you shouldn't even try, make music. The PA will sound cleaner if my mic is turned down most of the time except when I need it. That way it's not picking up all the other instruments. In a narrow sense you are right. In an equally narrow sense it would be technically proper to use autotune, just to make sure that it is in tune with the agreed tuning. But that one concern applies does not make it the optimum decision. If the PA can not be left untouched for a jazz concert, then the setup is plain wrong. It is an acoustic event that needs carry under some circumstances, but not a frigging x-factor event where everything is ultraproduced, the PA is there to convey it to the entire room. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Putting aside all the expressions of puritanical musical moral outrage, what I am interested in is whether or not there is s market for such a device. Sometimes I play jazz jobs and have no mic at all , the and other times I'm playing in a funk band, and when the guitar player stomps on his solo switch , I want to do the same. Why doesn't the guitar player just set his volume higher and then play more softly? Because when you turn up the volume , you amplify the hum and noise and fretboard sounds. Same for me, if I set my volume high and then back off the mic during non-solo periods, it picks up every little clank and rattle of my 1954 vintage sax, not to mention all the other Amps and drums around me. So my suggestion is a practical solution for real-world musicians, and if it violates someone's concept of a utopian musical world , then I can live with that.
|
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/04/2015 9:17 a.m., Randy Yates wrote:
writes: I play the sax and would love to have a mic with a boost switch that I can press when I take a solo. This could simply be a 10 db pad in the normal case which is removed when the switch is pressed. Just a few resistors and a switch. Does anyone make such a device? It could even be built into an xlr shell. Peter does have a point, I think, although he obviously could have stated it in more friendly terms. Is this a mike on a boom stand? Why not use your position (get closer) and dynamics to bring it up for a solo? --A working pianist I'd stick with "play with dynamics" rather than make myself as annoying as a self-obsessed electric lead guitarist or loud drummer. Or change to guitar and get an amp that goes to 11. Or use mic technique (unless bell-mounted) and get a mic with a pattern that doesn't pick up extraneous signal. geolff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Microphones and the TSA | Pro Audio | |||
pro microphones | Pro Audio | |||
Red microphones, my my my | Pro Audio | |||
T.H.E. Microphones | Pro Audio | |||
microphones | Pro Audio |