Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to
output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... www.customtubeconsoles.com Have anything you like but not for $1000 Cheers ian |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Danny T" wrote in message ... I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... scour ebay for a small old Ramsa George |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:05:13 -0400, "George's Pro Sound Co."
wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... scour ebay for a small old Ramsa Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:05:13 -0400, "George's Pro Sound Co." wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... scour ebay for a small old Ramsa Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? if clean and running proper, yes. if run hard and hung up wet then no george |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurence Payne wrote:
Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Depends on the application and what other equipment is used with it, but in general, no. If cost was important, I'd use a Behrenger or Mackie mixer, take care to keep the signal level in the "sweet spot" (no clipping, enough level to overcome noise) and put my money into better mics. Of course, if there was a special requirement, like very low input signal levels (recording nature sounds and such) then I'd have to look elsewhere, and probably spend more money. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 7:47*am, Mike Rivers wrote:
Laurence Payne wrote: Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Depends on the application and what other equipment is used with it, but in general, no. If cost was important, I'd use a Behrenger or Mackie mixer, take care to keep the signal level in the "sweet spot" (no clipping, enough level to overcome noise) and put my money into better mics. I'm using an AKG C5 and think it sound really good. There can be a bit of a shrill side to it when I plug it into something like a Berhinger board but through some of the better preamps is sounds very nice. I have tried other mics but other better mics seem to feedback a lot easier. This mic is pretty tight patterned so it doesn't so much. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurence Payne wrote:
Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Yes, and not only that you can be a lot sloppier with gain structure and get away with it. The difference is like night and day. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 3:47*am, Laurence Payne wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:05:13 -0400, "George's Pro Sound Co." wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... scour ebay for a small *old Ramsa Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? I have a behringer board and the preamps are really noisy. I've use to good stuff so maybe I'm being too picky but I think most things sound better then a behringer preamp especially when its fairly low volume acoustic music that I do. If I was doing electric guitars and drum sets there is a lot of room to burry stuff but when its a single acoustic guitar and one guy singing, hiss really shows up. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Danny T" wrote in message ... On Apr 22, 3:47 am, Laurence Payne wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:05:13 -0400, "George's Pro Sound Co." wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... scour ebay for a small old Ramsa Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? I have a behringer board and the preamps are really noisy. I've use to good stuff so maybe I'm being too picky but I think most things sound better then a behringer preamp especially when its fairly low volume acoustic music that I do. If I was doing electric guitars and drum sets there is a lot of room to burry stuff but when its a single acoustic guitar and one guy singing, hiss really shows up. it is just harder to get to the sweet spot on the behringer/mackie level type gear, if you are haveing hiss I would reconsider your gain stageing, including turning down the amplifers George |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu 2038-Apr-22 10:55, George writes:
I have a behringer board and the preamps are really noisy. I've use to good stuff so maybe I'm being too picky but I think most things sound better then a behringer preamp especially when its fairly low volume acoustic music that I do. If I was doing electric guitars and drum sets there is a lot of room to burry stuff but when its a single acoustic guitar and one guy singing, hiss really shows up. it is just harder to get to the sweet spot on the behringer/mackie level type gear, if you are haveing hiss I would reconsider your gain stageing, including turning down the amplifers Yep, that's wat I'd try to do. Behringer, PHonic, etc. all essentially bic lighter gear, but for clubbing good enough for the application. Harder to do, but you should be able to get the gain staging so you don't hear all that noise. Regards, Richard remote audio in the Memphis, Tn. area: See www.gatasound.com -- | Remove .my.foot for email | via Waldo's Place USA Fidonet-Internet Gateway Site | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I ended up with the Xenyx as a result of several years of radical downsizing. Soundwise, it seemed like the first Behringer that was good enough, didn't get in the way. I definitely liked being able to come up with passable results for such a small investment. Unfortunately for my pocket, the bubble is burst. I'll probably never own a large console again, but sooner or later I'll get a baby Studer or something similar. Predrag |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 10:13*am, "Predrag Trpkov"
wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I expect to read comments like that in the "audiophile" groups. Did you make ANY measurements to verify what you think you hear? Mark |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 10:13 am, "Predrag Trpkov" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I expect to read comments like that in the "audiophile" groups. Did you make ANY measurements to verify what you think you hear? Mark Measurements are pointless, if you can't hear a diffrence there is no diffrence. When you hear a night and day difference regardless of the measurments there is a night vs. day difference george |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 10:13 am, "Predrag Trpkov" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I expect to read comments like that in the "audiophile" groups. Did you make ANY measurements to verify what you think you hear? Mark Sorry for hurting your feelings, my dear, terribly sorry. I'm just a poor recordist, making records, you know, using my ears and fingers. No money for your expensive measurement gear. Even if I had the gear I wouldn't know how to measure, stupid me. So, no measurements. Terribly, terribly sorry. Of course they sound the same, Behringer and Allen & Heath. No difference at all. How could I ever have said something so ridiculous. Predrag |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark" wrote in message
On Apr 23, 10:13 am, "Predrag Trpkov" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I expect to read comments like that in the "audiophile" groups. Did you make ANY measurements to verify what you think you hear? More to the point, did he do any well-controlled listening tests? The new Behringer consoles I've bench tested don't turn out too badly. On balance, cheap consoles tend to be weak in the switches, pots and connectors department and the smaller Behringer consoles I've owned for 3-5 years have shown a few weaknesses in this area. Note that is not true of every piece of Behringer gear that I've owned. In other cases the pots, switches, and connectors have held up very well. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Apr 23, 10:13 am, "Predrag Trpkov" wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Will an older "high end" board really sound noticeably better than a modern Behringer? Having switched recently from the Behringer Xenyx 2442FX to the Allen & Heath WZ 20:8:2 (the first generation of Wizard mixers, mid-90s, good, but not quite high end), I'd say yes, it's still a big difference. Even with the clearly superior A&H preamps and eqs out of the equation, just listening to a rough mix from the multitrack recorder, using only faders and pan pots, the notorious veil is gone. The improvement in transparency and definition is striking. I expect to read comments like that in the "audiophile" groups. Did you make ANY measurements to verify what you think you hear? Mark One works day in and day out, and nights, too, with one's kit. Sometimes there is no more need to test something on a bench than there is to subject one's fiddle to vibration analysis to find out if it sounds good. Just play it. If recordists had to take measurements ahead of every sonic decision made about this or that piece of gear en route to delivering a product the first record would never have been cut. At some point the work is about music. -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Danny T" wrote in message
... I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? You are about fifteen to twenty years too late for that. Used to be a lot of old Neve suitcases, Ward-Beck broadcast consoles, baby Studers, and old early Yamahas that sold for next to nothing. These days the kids will buy up any of that stuff at insanely high prices to chop up to make DAW front ends with the channel strips and there is no cheap stuff out there. You might look at something like the smaller Quolle... but even that is a good bit more than $1k. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 10:44*am, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
"Danny T" wrote in message ... I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? You are about fifteen to twenty years too late for that. *Used to be a lot of old Neve suitcases, Ward-Beck broadcast consoles, baby Studers, and old early Yamahas that sold for next to nothing. *These days the kids will buy up any of that stuff at insanely high prices to chop up to make DAW front ends with the channel strips and there is no cheap stuff out there. You might look at something like the smaller Quolle... but even that is a good bit more than $1k. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. *C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." I know! I use to see those old boards getting given away but then the parts started getting worth a lot for the "vintage" thing. I snoozed :-) I want set up a nice portable way to record and I mean portable is the operative word. If I can't carry it easily and pretty much all at once I'm not going to buy it. I'd just use some avalon 737's if there wan't a weight issue. I was at a studio in San Diego (crystal something) a few years back helping a use-to-be friend record some tunes and I brought my own mics since the studio was a low budget type. I lost $4,000 in mics that day when someone absconded with them. From that day on I just make sure I travel light so I can keep an eye on my things. |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
I want set up a nice portable way to record and I mean portable is the operative word. A small EPM (silky to my ears) or a small Mackie (I have an early version, it is grainy to my ears, but in an up-front manner that can be charming) and one or two Edirol R44's Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 12:03*pm, "Peter Larsen" wrote:
Danny T wrote: I want set up a nice portable way to record and I mean portable is the operative word. A small EPM (silky to my ears) or a small Mackie (I have an early version, it is grainy to my ears, but in an up-front manner that can be charming) and one or two Edirol R44's * Kind regards * Peter Larsen I have been trying to find the measurements of the EPM's but cannot. I think if I am going to go that cheap I'll get at least the 8 and maybe the 12 so that I can use it on more then my intended plan but also to keep some channels as reserve in case some fail. Where can find the physical dimensions on these? Soungdcraft.com doesn't even list them - what's up with that? (I have a cool little soft rack thing with a mixer "pocket" and I'm going to fit my mixer in it and that's final :-) |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... Jesus, Danny, one Neve module goes for mutliples of that money. A Metric Halo ULN-8 comes to mind, but not within a grand. -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 12:57*pm, (hank alrich) wrote:
Danny T wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... Jesus, Danny, one Neve module goes for mutliples of that money. A Metric Halo ULN-8 comes to mind, but not within a grand. -- ha shut up and play your guitarhttp://hankalrich.com/http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma Truth be told - I had old pricing in mind and posted this then looked up prices and deleted the post. It still came, though....? Anyway, I know. I'm going to probably just cough up more cash. My main goal is to be mobil and very lightweight. I need to fit good into small, but I must keep small. The Metric Halo ULN-8 is about 6K so that isn't an option. What I'll likely do is find some good preamps and pair it with an adequate summing desk. |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 12:57*pm, (hank alrich) wrote:
Danny T wrote: I only need a few channels but want true high end from preamp to output. I don't need A/D, just a 4X2 with inserts, great pre's, eq and it would help to have channel outs but isn't a must. One stipulation is something that require only a little standard maintenance and easy maintenance. Is there an aging neve or something its equal or better that can be had for $1000? Thanks for the ideas... Jesus, Danny, one Neve module goes for mutliples of that money. A Metric Halo ULN-8 comes to mind, but not within a grand. -- ha shut up and play your guitarhttp://hankalrich.com/http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma OH - and by the way, thanks for the CD. I really enjoyed the listen and it officially made it to the stared group (don't cringe) in mp3 format on my iphone :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTD: Roland M-1000 Digital Line Mixer | Marketplace | |||
FS: Yamaha DMC 1000 Digital Mixer..(2) SPX 1000's | Pro Audio | |||
Best small mixer and/or mixer/amp/spkr combo? | Pro Audio | |||
best 16 ch. mixer around $1000 ? | Pro Audio | |||
Which used mixer at 1000$? | Pro Audio |