[MiNe 109]

Now that our right-wingers have Gone Galt, just a little goodbye nugget
for them to treasu

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,5553190.story

Higher costs could be unintended consequence of deep cuts

--

Headline says it all.

Anyone missing the special arguing style formerly exclusive to RAO can
find it at RA-HE, where "seems to me" is the last word.

Stephen

[John Doe]

MiNe 109 wrote:

Now that our right-wingers have Gone Galt, just a little goodbye nugget
for them to treasu

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,5553190.story

Higher costs could be unintended consequence of deep cuts

And then there are Democrats who want to spend trillions on
government run healthcare, waste enormous effort pursuing
inefficient energy technologies and ignoring
zero-greenhouse-gas-emissions nuclear power while whining about
global warming, continue pouring hundreds of billions into
Iraq/Afghanistan with no end in sight. Very amusing and depressing
to see Democrat leaders (including from California) talk about
pouring more money into Afghanistan. What money?

Good luck making that pig fly. Seriously.

What happened to the Democrat Senator that used to present pretty
charts and talk about all of the red ink? Takes little research to
find his name...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/03/us...-politics.html

Where did he go?!
Senator Kent Conrad, the Democrat Houdini who just disappeared.

The problem was that Democrats had no control over spending, not
that they cared about the consequence of continuing to borrow more
money from communist countries like China. Currently, Democrats
are talking about some very serious red ink.

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
John Doe wrote:

Currently, Democrats are talking about some very serious red ink.

Is it a right-wing thing to bring up fifty topics when discussing one?

Stephen

[John Doe]

MiNe 109 smcelroy2 POPaustin.rr.com wrote:

John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

Currently, Democrats are talking about some very serious red ink.

Is it a right-wing thing to bring up fifty topics when discussing one?

To an extremist, everyone who disagrees with him is on the
opposite extreme.
















Stephen


Path: news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.wiretrip.org!n ewsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all! news.stack.nl!aioe.org!smcelroy2
From: MiNe 109 smcelroy2 POPaustin.rr.com
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Subject: OT Democracy Gone Wild! (was OT Goodbye, CA)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:20:36 -0500
Organization: Stephen McElroy
Lines: 8
Message-ID: smcelroy2-192C6A.12203620072009 nntp.aioe.org
References: smcelroy2-706A5E.11115420072009 nntp.aioe.org 0012b059$0$4902$c3e8da3 news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: PA99kiV13UtsGqaCeX6grg.user.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.7.9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fio/f2PiOJWHeh3nSqeWwpanP/k=
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X)

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
John Doe wrote:

MiNe 109 smcelroy2 POPaustin.rr.com wrote:

John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

Currently, Democrats are talking about some very serious red ink.

Is it a right-wing thing to bring up fifty topics when discussing one?

To an extremist, everyone who disagrees with him is on the
opposite extreme.

I think the phrase you're looking for is "excluded middle."

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 20, 11:11*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
Now that our right-wingers have Gone Galt, just a little goodbye nugget
for them to treasu

2pid and Clyde were only here for my amusement. Now that I can only
post infrequently their very reason for existance is gone.

That and now 2pid can't call me an "RIPer" any more. That has to hurt.
LoL.

I may be passing through Austin soon. When I know for sure perhaps
you'd be willing to give advice restaurants, etc.?

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Jul 20, 11:11*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
Now that our right-wingers have Gone Galt, just a little goodbye nugget
for them to treasu

2pid and Clyde were only here for my amusement. Now that I can only
post infrequently their very reason for existance is gone.

That and now 2pid can't call me an "RIPer" any more. That has to hurt.
LoL.

I may be passing through Austin soon. When I know for sure perhaps
you'd be willing to give advice restaurants, etc.?

Can do! Austin's a good place to visit.

Stephen

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jul 20, 10:27�am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
�"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Jul 20, 11:11�am, MiNe 109 � wrote:
Now that our right-wingers have Gone Galt, just a little goodbye nugget
for them to treasu

2pid and Clyde were only here for my amusement. Now that I can only
post infrequently their very reason for existance is gone.

That and now 2pid can't call me an "RIPer" any more. That has to hurt.
LoL.

I may be passing through Austin soon. When I know for sure perhaps
you'd be willing to give advice restaurants, etc.?

Can do! Austin's a good place to visit.


I may be living there by the end of the summer.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
vinyl anachronist wrote:

On Jul 20, 10:27?am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
?"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

I may be passing through Austin soon. When I know for sure perhaps
you'd be willing to give advice restaurants, etc.?

Can do! Austin's a good place to visit.


I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Fantastic! Bring rain with you if you do.

Stephen

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jul 20, 4:33�pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
�vinyl anachronist wrote:

On Jul 20, 10:27?am, MiNe 109 � wrote:
In article
,
?"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
I may be passing through Austin soon. When I know for sure perhaps
you'd be willing to give advice restaurants, etc.?

Can do! Austin's a good place to visit.

I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Fantastic! Bring rain with you if you do.

Stephen

That's my one reservation...big change in weather. I actually like the
rain.

[hophead]

In article 75771ed4-f625-4930-8098-
,
says...

I may be living there by the end of the summer.


Wow - I've heard Austin is a neat place, but in my opinion you are
currently living in paradise!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

hophead said:

Wow - I've heard Austin is a neat place, but in my opinion you are
currently living in paradise!

Maybe he wants to work on his tan.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jul 20, 5:00�pm, hophead wrote:
In article 75771ed4-f625-4930-8098-
,
says...

I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Wow - I've heard Austin is a neat place, but in my opinion you are
currently living in paradise!

I really do like it here a lot, but opportunity is knocking very
loudly.

[GeoSynch]

The BaBoon is on the move:

Austin's a good place to visit.

I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Wore out your welcome in another locale? Gee, what a surprise...

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 21, 3:54*am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
The BaBoon is on the move:

Austin's a good place to visit.
I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Wore out your welcome in another locale? Gee, what a surprise...

Hm. I'd try "Have you worn" but I will defer to your superior
knowledge of verbosity.

Aside from klub meetings with Bratzi are you welcome anywhere?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jul 21, 1:54�am, "GeoSynch" wrote:
The BaBoon is on the move:

Austin's a good place to visit.
I may be living there by the end of the summer.

Wore out your welcome in another locale?

Nope.

Gee, what a surprise...

I'm not surprised that you would automatically think the worst. A
psychologist would tell you that your negative thinking about others
stems from the fact that your own life is unrewarding,and
unfulfilling, and that your secret hope that others are worse off than
you is a HUGE defense mechanism.

So how ****ed up is your life?

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 20, 1:21*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


2pid and Clyde were only here for my amusement. Now that I can only
post infrequently their very reason for existance is gone.



You should visit me in Forest Lawn.
I am in lot 4286.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

You should visit me in Forest Lawn.
I am in lot 4286.

Who's in that little doggie-sized plot next to yours?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 20, 5:24*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Clyde Slick said:

You should visit me in Forest Lawn.
I am in lot 4286.

Who's in that little doggie-sized plot next to yours?

And who left that little pile of doo that's been so lovingly arranged
on plot 4286?