Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the preferred way of mixing synths that have a digital out? Is it
possible to truly mix in the digital domain, or is it just more practical to use the analog outs of the synths? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:26:00 GMT, "Matthew" wrote:
What's the preferred way of mixing synths that have a digital out? Is it possible to truly mix in the digital domain, or is it just more practical to use the analog outs of the synths? If the mixer has digital inputs, sure, use them. Or the analogue ones. It really makes little difference. If your ears manage to detect a difference, probably one of the inputs is set up badly! |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew wrote:
What's the preferred way of mixing synths that have a digital out? Is it possible to truly mix in the digital domain, or is it just more practical to use the analog outs of the synths? If you have a mixer with digital inputs and you can deal with clock synchronization, then you can do it that way, but it doesn't make sense to buy a new mixer just to accommodate the digital outputs of your synths. I really see no benefit to mixing things digitally that produce sound artificially other than that you can get lazy about setting levels and making noise-free connections, but you might introduce other problems. -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew wrote:
What's the preferred way of mixing synths that have a digital out? Is it possible to truly mix in the digital domain, or is it just more practical to use the analog outs of the synths? Sure, you can mix in the digital domain. You can plug the output of the synth directly into the digital input of a recorder or into a Tascam or Yamaha digital mixer. What is preferred depends on the sound you want to get and how you like to work. For all I know, the sound you want might require miking a Leslie. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Sure, you can mix in the digital domain. You can plug the output of the synth directly into the digital input of a recorder or into a Tascam or Yamaha digital mixer. Maybe. Most synths that have digital output have S/PDIF optical and most digital mixers, if they have a TOSLink input at all, have it in the ADAT configuration. I think Kurzweil had a polyphonic synth with an ADAT optical output which allowed you to assign different voices to different digital channels, but that's getting a little too fancy for the simple question, I think. What is preferred depends on the sound you want to get and how you like to work. For all I know, the sound you want might require miking a Leslie. Mostly what's preferred is whatever connection will work at all. Square pegs (TOSLink) don't fit round holes (S/PDIF Coax, AES/EBU, or AES3id) very well. And then there's the issue of word clock synchronization. If it's the only digtal input to the mixer, chances are the mixer can se set to pick up the clock from that input. But if you have a bunch of synths, all with digital outputs, all connected to a digital mixer, either all the mixer inputs must be self-clocking (reclocking) or the word clocks have to be synchronized somehow. Simple questions have a way of yielding complicated answers. -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: Sure, you can mix in the digital domain. You can plug the output of the synth directly into the digital input of a recorder or into a Tascam or Yamaha digital mixer. Maybe. Most synths that have digital output have S/PDIF optical and most digital mixers, if they have a TOSLink input at all, have it in the ADAT configuration. I think Kurzweil had a polyphonic synth with an ADAT optical output which allowed you to assign different voices to different digital channels, but that's getting a little too fancy for the simple question, I think. So you spend a little money for the box from HOSA that converts Toslink to AES/EBU, or you use an old DAT machine. But yes. What is preferred depends on the sound you want to get and how you like to work. For all I know, the sound you want might require miking a Leslie. Mostly what's preferred is whatever connection will work at all. Square pegs (TOSLink) don't fit round holes (S/PDIF Coax, AES/EBU, or AES3id) very well. And then there's the issue of word clock synchronization. If it's the only digtal input to the mixer, chances are the mixer can se set to pick up the clock from that input. But if you have a bunch of synths, all with digital outputs, all connected to a digital mixer, either all the mixer inputs must be self-clocking (reclocking) or the word clocks have to be synchronized somehow. Don't do it, hold out for the Leslie with the SM-57. It's still cool. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|