[George M. Middius[_4_]]

"I'm a uniter, not a divider."

Who said that? Scottie? Sacky?

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Aug, 22:05, George M. Middius wrote:
"I'm a uniter, not a divider."

Who said that? Scottie? Sacky?

not me!!!!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

"I'm a uniter, not a divider."

Who said that? Scottie? Sacky?

not me!!!!

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was hoping you or Witless would be able to remind
me who did say it. I believe it was a personage of some note. Any ideas?

[Clyde Slick]

On 31 Aug, 01:39, George M. Middius wrote:
Clyde Slick said:

"I'm a uniter, not a divider."

Who said that? Scottie? Sacky?

not me!!!!

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was hoping you or Witless would be able to remind
me who did say it. I believe it was a personage of some note. Any ideas?

I was responding to 'the letter of the law', so
to speak.
Since you just asked a better question, I will answer it
Bush said it when he was running for the Republican
nomination. Of course, he was referring to uniting republicans.
Nobody can unite Democrats, its a lost cause.
Not that the Reps don't have their fractures, but the Dems
have more of them, and on more issues and on having many
competing liberal special interest groups.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 31, 2:01*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 31 Aug, 01:39, George M. Middius wrote:

Clyde Slick said:

"I'm a uniter, not a divider."

Who said that? Scottie? Sacky?

not me!!!!

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was hoping you or Witless would be able to remind
me who did say it. I believe it was a personage of some note. Any ideas?

I was responding to 'the letter of the law', so
to speak.
Since you just asked a better question, I will answer it
Bush said it when he was running for the Republican
nomination. Of course, he was referring to uniting republicans.

Oh, my bad. I thought he meant "everybody" because he also famously
said that he was the "president of everybody".

Nobody can unite Democrats, its a lost cause.

Too much emphasis placed on "differing POVs".

Not that the Reps don't have their fractures, but the Dems
have more of them, and on more issues and on having many
competing liberal special interest groups.

Groupthink is *still* not a good thing, even after Rove.

Look what it's done to McCain.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Groupthink is *still* not a good thing, even after Rove.

That reminds me, who said this about a possible vp choice:

With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he¹s been a governor for
three years, he¹s been able but undistinguished. I don¹t think people
could really name a big, important thing that he¹s done. He was mayor of
the 105th largest city in America. And again, with all due respect to
Richmond, Virginia, it¹s smaller than Chula Vista, California; Aurora,
Colorado; Mesa or Gilbert, Arizona; north Las Vegas or Henderson,
Nevada. It¹s not a big town. So if he were to pick Governor Kaine, it
would be an intensely political choice where he said, `You know what?
I¹m really not, first and foremost, concerned with, is this person
capable of being president of the United States?

--

Stephen

[Clyde Slick]

On 31 Aug, 03:55, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Aug 31, 2:01*am, Clyde Slick wrote:


Bush said it when he was running for the Republican
nomination. Of course, he was referring to uniting republicans.

Oh, my bad. I thought he meant "everybody" because he also famously
said that he was the "president of everybody".




he is, every President is the Preident of everybody.
no Pres can unite everybody in a bitter, evenly divided
electorate.

[UnsteadyKen[_3_]]

George M. Middius wrote...

I believe it was a personage of some note. Any ideas?

http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0002/29/se.01.html
--
Ken

http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/buddyduck/