[Tobiah]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:

The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
duration of 10 - 50 seconds.

Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Industrial One]

On Jul 17, 10:23 am, Tobiah wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
duration of 10 - 50 seconds.

Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?

** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**

I'm a Trance/Industrial Rave freak. The test audio subjects do not
qualify, as Trance didn't exist at the time most of them were produced
(1986-1992), nor do I listen to them individually. This test is to
determine the most ideal lossy codec/bitrate for such music. Join in
if you want, no registration is required.

[Mr.T]

"Tobiah" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
duration of 10 - 50 seconds.

Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?

Because he doesn't know any better it seems.
Or is interested in proving what the rest of us knew 30 years ago.

MrT.

[Industrial One]

On Jul 17, 11:39 pm, "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:
"Tobiah" wrote in message

news
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
duration of 10 - 50 seconds.

Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?

Because he doesn't know any better it seems.
Or is interested in proving what the rest of us knew 30 years ago.

MrT.

You trying to take the ****? Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear
your confusion.

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

"Industrial One" wrote in message...

Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear your confusion.

RAR's don't ****, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.

[Industrial One]

On Jul 18, 12:41 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" /Odm
wrote:
"Industrial One" wrote in message...
Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear your confusion.

RAR's don't ****, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.

All right wise ass, if a 2-digit number means so much to you, I can
rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click. The archive will only be
about 250 megs.

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

"Industrial One" wrote in message...

"David Morgan \(MAMS\)" /Odm wrote:

"Industrial One" wrote in message...

Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear your confusion.

RAR's don't ****, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.

if a 2-digit number means so much to you,


?





--
David Morgan (MAMS)
Morgan Audio Media Service
http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com
Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901
_____________________________
http://www.januarysound.com

[Mr.T]

"Industrial One" wrote in message
...
On Jul 18, 12:41 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" /Odm
wrote:
"Industrial One" wrote in message...
Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear your confusion.

RAR's don't ****, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit
audio...
and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.

All right wise ass, if a 2-digit number means so much to you, I can
rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click. The archive will only be
about 250 megs.

Given that you have already proven to all here that you don't have the
slightest clue, why would anyone want to waste their time and money?
I would suggest that most people here have already done their own tests, or
can easily do so without your files.

MrT.

[Mr.T]

"Industrial One" wrote in message
...
You trying to take the ****? Download the ****ing RAR and it'll clear
your confusion.

I'm not the one confused, and I seriously doubt you'll find anyone to
support your position on 8 bit wave files here.
Why on earth would I want to download your crap, you'll never accept you are
wrong anyway.
I've already wasted too much time on your stupidity. Not wasting any more.
Good luck finding someone who will.

MrT.

[Industrial One[_2_]]

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:39:22 +1000, Mr.T wrote:



Because he doesn't know any better it seems.
Or is interested in proving what the rest of us knew 30 years ago.

MrT.

Suck my cock faggot ****!

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

"Industrial One" wrote...

Suck my cock faggot ****!

You are truly an idiot. Please keep your obnoxious sputum sealed within...

___________________________


Path:
nwrddc02.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1 .gnilink.net!gnilink.net!news.glorb.com!feeder.erj e.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news
..k-dsl.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Industrial One
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.opinion,re c.audio.pro
Subject: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
Followup-To: alt.idiots
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:32:11 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 10
Message-ID:
References:

NNTP-Posting-Host: LLKr5UafKM3198b2Bi82wA.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To:
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
Xref: news.verizon.net rec.audio.tech:126764 rec.audio.misc:35360 rec.audio.opinion:385228 rec.audio.pro:781739
X-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:31:56 EDT (nwrddc02.gnilink.net)

[Industrial One]

Wow, the trolls are really out tonight.

[[email protected]]

On Aug 18, 3:00 am, Industrial One wrote:
Wow, the trolls are really out tonight.

Quite, well, industrious, aren't they?