Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading the June 2008 AudioXPress and I found Gary Galo's AES column
quite interesting. He says: " Out of 554 trials there were 276 correct answers-no better than "coin flip" results. To those of us who have recorded in both high-res and CD-standard digital, the conclusions seem ridiculous". And: "On my own equipment, the differences between SACD and CD layers are readily audible. Yet the conclusion of Meyer and Moran is that "Our test results indicate that all of these recordings could be released on conventional CDs with no audible difference". In their view, "Further claims that careful 16/44.1 encoding audibly degrades high resolution signals must be supported by properly controlled double blind tests". Apparently they believe that recording engineers such as Tom Jung are simply deluding themselves. Perhaps we also need a series of ABX tests to verify whether there are any visible differences between NTSC and HDTV". -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BretLudwig" wrote in message
lkaboutaudio.com I was reading the June 2008 AudioXPress and I found Gary Galo's AES column quite interesting. He says: " Out of 554 trials there were 276 correct answers-no better than "coin flip" results. To those of us who have recorded in both high-res and CD-standard digital, the conclusions seem ridiculous". Gary Gallo seems to be unaware or disrespectful of other experienced recordists, like George Massenberg and Bob Katz, who weren't the least bit surprised because they been there and done that some years earlier. BTW, who is Gary Gallo to speak authoritatively? And: "On my own equipment, the differences between SACD and CD layers are readily audible. It would appear that Gary Gallo is not much of a practitioner of reliable listening tests. Yet the conclusion of Meyer and Moran is that "Our test results indicate that all of these recordings could be released on conventional CDs with no audible difference". In their view, "Further claims that careful 16/44.1 encoding audibly degrades high resolution signals must be supported by properly controlled double blind tests". One only uses DBTs if one is ready to put one's beliefs to a scientific test. Apparently they believe that recording engineers such as Tom Jung are simply deluding themselves. I believe the more relevant word is "illuding". Perhaps we also need a series of ABX tests to verify whether there are any visible differences between NTSC and HDTV". Straw man argument noted. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Iun, 11:54, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
One only uses DBTs if one is ready to put one's beliefs to a scientific test. It works for beliefs in virgin births, parting seas, talking to Jesus, and creation, too!!! put those to your scientific test, Arny. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Clyde Slick said: One only uses DBTs if one is ready to put one's beliefs to a scientific test. It works for beliefs in virgin births, parting seas, talking to Jesus, and creation, too!!! put those to your scientific test, Arny. We all know the Krooborg hasn't used his aBxism thingie in years. There's a term for demanding that others do what one doesn't do oneself. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Iun, 13:31, George M. Middius wrote:
Clyde Slick said: One only uses DBTs if one is ready to put one's beliefs to a scientific test. It works for beliefs in virgin births, parting seas, talking to Jesus, and creation, too!!! put those to your scientific test, Arny. We all know the Krooborg hasn't used his aBxism thingie in years. There's a term for demanding that others do what one doesn't do oneself. Scottocracy? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Clyde Slick said: We all know the Krooborg hasn't used his aBxism thingie in years. There's a term for demanding that others do what one doesn't do oneself. Scottocracy? ROOTLFLMOO! (A joke like that deserves a Krooglish laugh.) |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny:
"BTW, who is Gary Gallo to speak authoritatively?" Bret And Everyone Else: Pot. Kettle. Arny. -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Will SACD die? | High End Audio | |||
SACD | High End Audio | |||
My Take on SACD | Audio Opinions | |||
Arny, warming-up for the debate... Arny tells LIES ! | Audio Opinions | |||
SACD->CD ?? | Tech |