Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
WindsorFox[_3_] WindsorFox[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 240
Default WMA vs FLAC

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


--




"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous
mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it
is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Geoff Geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,562
Default WMA vs FLAC

WindsorFoxSS wrote:
Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Isn't FLAC lossless ? And WMA isn't ?

I guess it depends on how much space you want to save. Why not just LPCM
WAVs

geoff


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
WindsorFox[_3_] WindsorFox[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 240
Default WMA vs FLAC

geoff wrote:
WindsorFoxSS wrote:
Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Isn't FLAC lossless ? And WMA isn't ?

I guess it depends on how much space you want to save. Why not just LPCM
WAVs

geoff



They are both listed as lossless.


--

"I have no need to purchase any bulk e-mail software
and use it to **** off the Internet community and lose
my Internet account. If I want to **** off somebody,
I'll do it on a one-to-one basis." - Norman L. De Forest

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Richard Crowley Richard Crowley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,172
Default WMA vs FLAC

"WindsorFoxSS" wrote ...
Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Not until you precisely define "best" *in your context.*
And tell us what "archiving" means in your world, also.

  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Eeyore Eeyore is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,474
Default WMA vs FLAC



"WindsorFox" wrote:

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Linear PCM perhaps ?

Graham



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
WindsorFox[_3_] WindsorFox[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 240
Default WMA vs FLAC

Eeyore wrote:

"WindsorFox" wrote:

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Linear PCM perhaps ?

Graham


That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and I
guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any other
app available.

--

"I have no need to purchase any bulk e-mail software
and use it to **** off the Internet community and lose
my Internet account. If I want to **** off somebody,
I'll do it on a one-to-one basis." - Norman L. De Forest

  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Don Pearce Don Pearce is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,726
Default WMA vs FLAC


WindsorFoxSS wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

"WindsorFox" wrote:

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


Linear PCM perhaps ?

Graham


That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and I
guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any other
app available.


If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy will
give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.

d
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
WindsorFox[_3_] WindsorFox[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 240
Default WMA vs FLAC

don pearce wrote:

WindsorFoxSS wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

"WindsorFox" wrote:

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???

Linear PCM perhaps ?

Graham


That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and
I guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any
other app available.


If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy will
give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.

d


I've not yet used the program, so I can't refute that. All I can say
is that during the initial setup it asked how I wanted to save music for
archiving, FLAC or WMA lossless, please check one....

--

"I have no need to purchase any bulk e-mail software
and use it to **** off the Internet community and lose
my Internet account. If I want to **** off somebody,
I'll do it on a one-to-one basis." - Norman L. De Forest

  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Mr.T Mr.T is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,108
Default WMA vs FLAC


"don pearce" wrote in message
news:4dadnVc9ovz2aZDVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and I
guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any other
app available.


If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy will
give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.


Of course they can save the LPCM file without conversion, but most ripping
programs will also use a codec before saving the file to disk, if you select
that option. EAC can call many external codecs, or seamlessly use a codec
..DLL like LAME for example. So saying it is the "only" option is not exactly
correct since the data need not even be saved to disk before conversion,
given sufficient memory, which most computers have these days.

MrT.


  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Don Pearce Don Pearce is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,726
Default WMA vs FLAC


Mr.T wrote:
"don pearce" wrote in message
news:4dadnVc9ovz2aZDVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and I
guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any other
app available.

If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy will
give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.


Of course they can save the LPCM file without conversion, but most ripping
programs will also use a codec before saving the file to disk, if you select
that option. EAC can call many external codecs, or seamlessly use a codec
.DLL like LAME for example. So saying it is the "only" option is not exactly
correct since the data need not even be saved to disk before conversion,
given sufficient memory, which most computers have these days.

MrT.



You are quite right. I was thinking of using EAC for its intended
purpose, the exact copying of CDs.

d


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Steven Sullivan Steven Sullivan is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,268
Default WMA vs FLAC

don pearce wrote:

WindsorFoxSS wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

"WindsorFox" wrote:

Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???

Linear PCM perhaps ?

Graham


That wasn't an option. Exact Audio Copy is what the program is and I
guess it offers an archiving feature. I've had a couple of people
recommend it as making the best quality cd copies and rips of any other
app available.


If you are ripping a CD, they use Linear PCM, so Exact Audio Copy will
give you a LPCM archive - that is the only option.



Not if you configure EAC to pass the .wav file onto a file compressor. Indeed, EAC comes
'loaded' with an mp3 codec for that (some version of LAME, IIRC), and a handy graphic button
labelled 'MP3' to rip a CD 'directly' to compressed format, but you can point it to FLAC.exe
or any other codec you've got.




--
-S
maybe they wanna rock.
maybe they need to rock.
Maybe it's for the money? But That's none of our business..our business as fans is to rock
with them.
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Geoff Geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,562
Default WMA vs FLAC

Steven Sullivan wrote:

Not if you configure EAC to pass the .wav file onto a file
compressor. Indeed, EAC comes 'loaded' with an mp3 codec for that
(some version of LAME, IIRC), and a handy graphic button labelled
'MP3' to rip a CD 'directly' to compressed format, but you can point
it to FLAC.exe or any other codec you've got.


.... which is where it ceases to fit the description 'Exact Audio Copy'....

geoff


  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Arny Krueger Arny Krueger is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,262
Default WMA vs FLAC

"WindsorFoxSS" wrote in message


Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


If you care enough to listen to only the very best, then one of the lossless
codecs would be your best choice:

(1) WAV, AIF, WMA lossless, FLAC, Monkey, etc.

If more than about 2: 1 compression is required, then your best choice
would probably be chosen via the method of the weakest link. Determine
which compressed format is supported by all existing or proposed players,
whether portable, studio or home. That will probably break you down to

(2) MP3, MP4, AAC, or WMA.

If you have incompatible portable players, see (1) and resign yourself to
making up special compressed files for each player type.


  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
WindsorFox[_3_] WindsorFox[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 240
Default WMA vs FLAC

Arny Krueger wrote:
"WindsorFoxSS" wrote in message


Any thoughts on the best file for archiving music???


If you care enough to listen to only the very best, then one of the lossless
codecs would be your best choice:

(1) WAV, AIF, WMA lossless, FLAC, Monkey, etc.

If more than about 2: 1 compression is required, then your best choice
would probably be chosen via the method of the weakest link. Determine
which compressed format is supported by all existing or proposed players,
whether portable, studio or home. That will probably break you down to

(2) MP3, MP4, AAC, or WMA.

If you have incompatible portable players, see (1) and resign yourself to
making up special compressed files for each player type.



That's what I'm doing. Any music that I pull directly from a CD,
record or DVD will be lossless and I'll convert to something else as
needed to put on a portable.

What I seem to be getting is that FLAC is second most common and has
provision for better naming that WMA does, and then there's the open
part of FLAC that is not MS.

--

"I have no need to purchase any bulk e-mail software
and use it to **** off the Internet community and lose
my Internet account. If I want to **** off somebody,
I'll do it on a one-to-one basis." - Norman L. De Forest

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAV vs FLAC [email protected] Pro Audio 46 October 16th 06 02:22 AM
WAV vs FLAC [email protected] High End Audio 5 September 28th 06 12:46 AM
WAV or FLAC ripping [email protected] Audio Opinions 2 September 26th 06 10:04 PM
Flac Vs. Wav [email protected] Tech 10 September 26th 06 03:15 PM
how to rip to FLAC? Yibbels Tech 2 May 2nd 05 07:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"