David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:

But Lord.... you are inquiring (or boasting, not sure which)
about preparing raw audio for conversion to MP3.

Of thee I inquire, "Do aspects of normalization exist about which a man
such as I might find reason to boast?"

Or was it about ingnoring what happens there because you like louder MP3s?

I'm primarily concerned with preventing unnecessary ATH-centric
filtration of frequencies which is inherent to (I believe) all lossy
audio data-compression methods.

I wasn't surprised when you told Geoff to "butt out" of *YOUR* thread
here early on. He had already given you many answers with references
or links to back them up and other supporting replies on another
group, but you refused to accept them.

I believe most of the information Geoff has told me regarding
uncompressed CD/WAV audio has been useful. However, Geoff has been
unnecessarily and extremely rude to me on multiple occasions and to that
I do not take kindly. To this end I cite the lies about me which he
submitted in his original post to this thread.

The problem with foggy ideas Lord, is that you continually move away
from MP3 to preprocessing the .wav files prior to encoding.

The preprocessing of .wav file in order to create "better sounding" MP3s
is central to my hypothesis as defined in the post which spawned this
thread. I am not moving from one issue to another here.

Preprocessing WAVs to produce "better" MP3s *is* *the* issue.

please reiterate your so-called "Mission Statement" and clarify
please EXACTLY what is your question and EXACTLY what is it that
you are trying to accomplish here?

No need to reiterate, just click he

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Louder+IS+Better+(With+Lossy)&hl=en&lr=&i e=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3EFE7206.8030709%40spamsucks.ionet.net&rnum =2

You had a "theory".

I had (and still have) a hypothesis, not a theory.

It's been sufficiently challenged and virtually disproven here and on
two other newsgroups.

It has been debated. It has yet to be proven true or false.

You are about as likely to rescend your "theory" as Geoff is to stop
supporting his own experiences.

I am perfectly willing to abandon my theory if it can indeed be proven
false.

The very least you could do after creating a *very* long thread

Unless you've forgotten, I'm the one who was duly "spanked" for
attempting to moderate this thread in an effort to prevent it from
growing as large as it has. Apparently in unmoderated newsgroups such
as this, staying on-topic is not required and (thread)size matters not.

Let freedom ring!

Myke

--

-================================-
Windows...It's rebootylicious!!!
-================================-