What you describe is probably the single biggest reason to spend as much as
you can on speakers. Unless your electronics are grossly underpowered or
broken, different speakers will always sound far more different than will
cables, or most any other electronic component. OTOH, it is folly to
suggest that even the highest resolution speakers (whatever they are) will
allow you to hear a difference where none exists.


"Wylie Williams" wrote in message
et...
I recall in olden days Consumer Reports tested speakers with a method
that compared speakers under test with their reference(AR3a). It was an
elaborate system that they considered scientific, to see how closely other
speakers could mimic the sound of the AR, but I wondered how it was able
to
distinguish a speaker with better resolution than the AR3a.
This if prefatory to a conversation with an audiophile friend today. I
mentioned that I was not quite pleased with my system's sound. He asked
"Haven't you listened to those Tara Labs cables the rep loaned you? ( I
have
some expensive ones on loan, and some much cheaper ones I own and use) I
replied that I had but hadn't heard enough difference to be sure it was
real. Certainly no significant improvement to my ears.
His reply was that the problem is probably that my speakers are too low on
the food chain to discern the difference, and offered to loan me his when
he
goes out of town soon. He says I'll hear the difference then.
This raises an interesting point about all those listening tests we hear
about. Maybe the speakers in the tests have too little resolution to
allow
differences to be heard.
Have any of the subjectivist RAHE members (surely some exist) had the
experience of discovering that a some point getting better speakers
started
making a difference in being able to hear dfferences in the sound of
speaker
cables?

Wylie Williams