Dennis Moore wrote:
Well Tom, as is usual. No discussing with you, without you
getting off topic. The thread again was specifically about
high-end as defined on RAHE. You keep talking about it as
defined elsewhere. And it was of course you who talked
about conceit of loving music. And you who didn't seem to
want to look at the 'emotional response to music' mentioned
in the faq.

Oh well, now I have gotten into a ****ing contest of no use
to anyone. I think the moderators need to go with definition
a), be honest and drop b). And change the name to RAHF
(rec.audi.high.fidelity). But of course once created they
cannot change it. Well they can change the faq.

Dennis



If you don't want to see threads containing dbt discussions, why not
create your own newsgroup, like rec.audio.dbt-free, or
rec.audio.subjectivist? Or simply frequent those sections of Audio
Asylum where dbt's are banned?

A unique and very valuable feature of rec.audio.high-end is the
debunking of high-end myths, and dbt's, unfortunately for some, are a
necessary part of the debunking process. How else can you prove or
disprove the audible differences among cables, for instance, without
mentioning dbt's?