Arny Krueger wrote:


Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:

snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his
pathological distortion of information

Notice Richman's deliberate total obliteration of the post he claims to be
commenting on. I guess he's trying to claim that selective editing (done for
the sake of clarity and brevity) is morally worse than totally obliterating
the facts so that people have to scout around to find them.


Just more obfuscation and blather from RAO's most detested poster. Note that
Krueger once again fails to take responsibility for leveling an provoked attack
against me after I posted a joke on RAO which had no reference to him
whatsoever. All that has followed since from his lying responses has been a
pathetic attempt to avoid dealing with this basic fact.



Richman, are you a class act or what?

A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of
personal attacks against numerous RAO posters.

So what are you claiming Richman - that you're not hated or that you're not
a leading purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters?


Note Krueger's attempt to change the subject. His comment above about class
acts in reesponse to a joke I posted on RAO was just one of a 7 year history of
unprovoked personal attacks made against me - as well as many other posters -
by this obnoxious liar and hatemonger.

There is no evidene, as usual, to support any of his claims about hatred
directed at me except by him , of course, and one or two parasitic clones such
as McKelvey.
OTOH, we have a thead entitled, "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience?" which
outlines quite clearly the vast number of different posters that have been
slandered, defamed, smeared, and attacked by Krueger for no logical reason.



Both claims would be lies, of course.

Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to
observe.

To review, one symptom of a pathology would be that it makes the
pathological person unhappy and unable to form stable relationships, etc.

This is not necessaril;y true, even allowing for your total lack of insight re.
your own psychopathology. It's also circular and unsupported by any facts.
Many scientifically accepted and validated symptoms of psychopathology do not,
as far as has been proven, make people unhappy. For example, Krueger posts
delusional thoughts about sockpuppet conspiracies here on a fairly regular
basis.
(See his comments about Middius, Atkinson, etc. in which he accuses them of
running sockpuppets). There is no evidence that his delusional rantings on
this subject make him unhappy. If, as he claims, without any empricial evidence
to support it (see below), he has no trouble forming interpersonal
relationships that are stable, then apparently his delusiional rantings about
sockpuppets don't interfere with "ability".

Of course, one could also point out that "stable interpersonal relationships"
don't indicate that the other people involve even LIKE Krueger. Once could say
he has *many* stable interpersonal relationships on RAO - and almost all of
them involve people that are disgusted and revolted by his obnoxious and
irrational behavior.

LOL!.


Now I'm obviously pretty happy (having this romp at Richman's expense) and
its well-known that in the real world I have many stable and lengthy
relationships.

There is no eviudence whatsoever, other than in the diseased and empty cavities
of Krueger's "mind" (such as it is) that he has accomplished anything here
other than make a fool of himself by pretending to (a) know something about
psychopathology, (b) know something about how interpersonal relationships
develop), and (c) insult the intelligence of all RAO readers by once again
failing to address the basic fact that he leveled a personal attack against a
joke I posted which never referred to him at all.

There is no evidence provided to substantiate Krueger's probable false claim
that he has many stable and lengthy personal relationships. Are we to take
this proven liar's word for it? I think not. OTOH, there is a 7 year history
of Krueger's "stable and length" interpersonal relationships on RAO that he has
formed. Yes, indeed. They are many. They are stable. They are lengthy. And
has pointed out over by many people over a 7 year period, most of them involve
relationships in which the other party has quickly developed an intense feeling
of revulsion, disgust and dislike because of Krueger's well-documented history
of engaging in unprovoked personal attacks against them.




OTOH, in this post Richman seems to be very unhappy and in
fact we know nothing about Richman's real-world relationships. So who's more
pathological, Richman or Krueger?


Not even a rational or logical try to change the subject under investigation.
Since Krueger's claims about psychopatholgoy and interpersonal relationships
have been shown to be illogical and unsupported by any empirical evidence, who
cares about what questions he now tries, unsuccessfully to raise, to change the
focus - namely, his latest unprovoked personal attack against me - as
exemplified by his comments about a joke that I posted. Note that he has still
not given any defense for this incontrovertible fact. And of course, he never
will, given his basic dishonesty.





Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by
most of RAO's posters.

Most of RAO's regular posters are sociopaths or borderline sociopaths, like
Phillips, Richman, Weil, Middius, Devil, Maggie, etc.

Given Kruegerr's basic lack of knowledge about psychopatholgy, the above
comments arre ludicrous and as is typical of Krueger, lies. Unlike myself,
Krueger has no quialifications that would even remotely enable him to comment
meaningfully about psychpathology. His stupidity was very well demonstrated
above when he made the idiotic claim that those with "a symptom of
psychopathology" would be unhappy. This is not necessarily true, as Krueger
himself demonstrates. After all he claims to "enjoy" himself when he makes his
usual; delusional and paranoid (2 symptoms) accuations about Middius, Atkinson
and others having "cliques" or "networks" of sockpuppets that attack him.




So the fact that they
would have problems with a person who is reasonably sane and well-adjusted
should be no surprise.


ROFLMAO!!!!!! Let's let all the posters of RAO decide whether Krueger meets
this criteria. Krueger's pathological psotings are a matter of Google record.
As as pointed out many times in the past by numerous psoters, his behavior on
RAO easily meets the criteria for several diagnostic criteria, most notably
that of Paranoid Personality Disorder. Note that this is not a diagnosis, just
an observation based on his online postings. This current post is just the
latest example of that.





For further documentation, see the following historical account. The
comments there are as valid today as when they were first made.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a
tt.net&output=gplain

Just another unhappy sociopath (who seems to have almost completely
disappeared off the face of Usenet) venting his frustrations.


There is no evidence that Mr. Shain had any socipathic tendencies whatsoever.
Neither is there any evidence that he was "frustrated". But as usual, Krueger
likes to lie about people without presenting any evidence to support his
delusional claims.

What Mr. Shain's post illustrates, however, is that a significantly large
number of different RAO posters have been attacked, defamed, slandered, lied
about, and attacked without provocation by Krueger. It's also worth pointing
out that no other RAO poster, AFAIK, has *ever* been described in this way -
only Krueger. The reaons for this are quite obvious.




BTW, it appears that one of Ed's current ventures (after the collapse of
Vergence) can be examined by visiting www.metropolisdvd.com











Bruce J. Richman