[Les Cargill[_4_]]

Don Pearce wrote:
On 24 May 2017 20:22:06 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:

Here is a spectrogram of birdsong, and it makes it pretty easy to see
why a) the idea of 1% matching is crazy, and b) this kind of
spectrogram is the only sensible way to look at it

http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/look/birdsong.png

Clearly this depends on the bird, though. Here is Coco, the electus:
http://www.panix.com/~kludge/beep.mp3
Warning: this is a very loud and annoying beeping noise that comes from
a bird.
--scott

Even your tone-like bird is a lot more complex than it seems. Here's
its spectrogram. There is an underlying tone at 2875Hz, but the first
half of the sound is much thicker, with plenty of sound down to about
2630Hz. So even something as clear as this can't be assessed to 1%

http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/look/scotts_bird.png

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


I totally want to make a wrap of the png and put it on a van now.
( not really

--
Les Cargill