[Scott Dorsey]

geoff wrote:
On 30/12/2015 4:13 p.m., Trevor wrote:
On 30/12/2015 3:04 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I see two things going on. First of all, there is the point I made
earlier
that people tend to think something that sounds different must be better.
Really different? Must be really better.

Subjectively comparing two systems that are "really different" to each
other, both are "really different"! The choice of which is "really
better" simply comes down to personal bias when no objective measure is
taken. Frankly I have never had a problem with that until they start
telling me that one is more *accurate* simply because they think it is.
The greatest example of that is how many people still claim vinyl is
more accurate, rather than simply more pleasing to them. When I point
out the difference they still insist vinyl is always more accurate.

I believe it is more accurate when Alan Parsons says it is. YMMV.

Would you settle for Wavy Gravy saying so?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."