[geoff]

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
...
On 12/27/2012 11:17 PM, Phil W wrote:

Since this plug-in can be regarded to be "broken" - probably
because of coding errors, I would not rely on it anymore and
get a substitute.

"Broken" implies that it once wasn't broken. If it has coding errors, it's
poorly designed. If it stopped working because something else on the
system changed, then the system, not the program, is broken.

Or that the coding is fragile, and a legitimate change in the system else
may have broken it.


geoff