Favorite EQ Plug in
On Mon 2012-Dec-24 09:20, Scott Dorsey writes:
snip
Most of what I do is to tape, but when I use a computer I pretty much use
it like a tape machine with fancy editing features, and mix
conventionally.
Mixing in the box just seems phenomenally crude, especially when we
already
have a much better tool for the job sitting right there.
It's not the processing that is phenomenally crude, it's the user
interface.
Ditto here. Old blidn man doesn't mouse. Yes, for some
things, workibng on a database, I might use something which
requires my synthesized speech and screenreader to do mouse emulator, but then I have to listen to the speech to tell me where my "mouse" is pointing. I don't have time to listen
to an artificial voicebox talking to me when I'm trying to
listen to the audio which pays the bill. I want a knob, a
switch, etc. I may record digitally, but that's why I let
the daw surgeons do other stuff, if needed these days.
But then, as MIke notes, I try to capture the performance so that I don't need eq, etc. When I do need such things, I've got good gear in the racks in the truck, such as if we're
going to air live ,grin.
Regards,
Richard
--
| Remove .my.foot for email
| via Waldo's Place USA Fidonet-Internet Gateway Site
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
|