Favorite EQ Plug in
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Mike Rivers wrote:
On 12/24/2012 9:20 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
It's not the processing that is phenomenally crude, it's the user interface.
The processing might be great, but I want faders that I can ride and I
want one control per function.
Typically, an EQ plug-in looks like the real thing. You see
one knob or switch per function, but you have only one
control, and that's the mouse that you have to move to each
knob before you can adjust what that knob adjusts.
Right, it's not the plug-ins I am complaining about, it's the mixing process.
I don't find I need to make a lot of fader moves. If I *do* need to,
they're stored as metadata with the project.
The plug-ins might be fine, but if I am using a mixer I already have with
outboard stuff I already have, why should I bother?
--scott
--
Les Cargill
|