[Arny Krueger[_5_]]

"Scott" wrote in message
...
On Dec 10, 7:35 pm, wrote:

Very poorly. Clearly Stereo review was a publication that had a very
clear preconception about how certain components sound.

That is not clear to me at all.

I am of the opinion that many people are biased against Stereo Review and
make posts like the one above regardless of whatever facts can be brought to
the discussion.



Clearly Stereo Review was not a scientific journal and had no proper peer
review process.

Neither are any of the journals you priase such as Stereophile or TAS. The
above statement is obviously an attempt to single out one magazine of many
for a situation that affected them all. In short it supports my supposition
that its author is highly biased against SR.