headphones
"geoff" wrote in message
...
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"geoff" wrote in message
Part of the difference is unquestionably the use of ambience
channels. Shutting them off produces an immediate degradation in
sound quality.
No. "Change" in sound. Does not necesarily equate to "quality".
Wrong again. See preceding response.
I sauggest the degradation may be entirely subjective, and is to do with
the
overall experience rather than fidelity.
Subjectivity is reality in this context -- qv, psychoacoustics.
Regardless, "something else" is going on here. One's perception of
instrumental timbre varies with the presence or absence of ambience, whether
it's real or synthesized.
Your 45 beats my 30. Presumably your ears have not degraded in those 45
years as much as mine have in 30.
Depend on our ages. My ears still get to about 12kHz.
I might vehemently disagree with Arny. But at least he uses his real
name, and we know who he is.
Hit a raw nerve somewhere have I ?
Oh, yes. I have little respect for people who won't reveal who they are.
|