Review of Audition 5.5
On Jun 17, 2:25*pm, Jason Warren wrote:
Reading between the lines in the forum makes me think I know just where the engineers
stand. I managed rewrites of some legacy IBM code and some that arrived via acquisitions.
You reach a point where the old code is just so convoluted and has suffered so many
patches that rewriting it is all that makes sense. That approach *always* upsets
schedule-driven managers, but they come around a year later when the bug reports fall
off.
Jason
The thing is, they claimed to have completely rewritten the code for
version 2 as well so the code isn't actually that old and should have
been able to cope with multiple processors which were common when
version 2 came out. Version 2 was also a disaster and it prompted me
to move over to Reaper for multi-track work. Reaper and Audition 1.5
make a formidable combination although I'm thinking of replacing
Audition with Izotope RX as I mainly use Audition for its restoration
tools.
James.
|