[Audio Empire]

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:34:07 -0700, bob wrote
(in article ):

On Apr 5, 12:47=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote:

That doesn't matter. When you bring up something that's this obscure, the
onus is on YOU to be forthcoming with the information. 30 years ago I, to=
o,
was an AES member, but I certainly don't know what the protocols for
screening JAES papers for publication are. I still say no one here except=
you
and possibly one or two other posters here who know that.

Oh, for crying out loud. I'm not even an engineer, and have never
worked in the audio field in any capacity. And even I know the JAES is
a peer-reviewed journal. Wake up.

bob


For crying out loud indeed! I KNOW the JAES is a peer-reviewed journal, what
I don't know (and I'll bet money that you don't know either) is what the
protocols are for that peer review. THAT was the issue, not whether or not
the journal IS peer reviewed. I think that if Arny is going to criticize
someone who doesn't know the peer review protocols for a journal that is not
easily available to everyone here, then he needs to supply them. Personally,
I don't care what they are, but if you mention something like that, be
prepared to supply the info, or at least where the info can be accessed.