[Scott[_6_]]

On Feb 8, 7:04=A0am, Steven Sullivan wrote:
Scott wrote:
On Jan 25, 7:03=3DA0pm, bob wrote:

And what a shame it is that the high-end community has spent the
better part of three decades wailing about the inadequacies of CD as =
a
medium, rather than about the quality of the recordings.

News to me. I have heard a lot of complaints about recording and
mastering of new material since the introduction of CDs to audio. I
certainly have done my fair share of complaining. I try not to wail
about it though.

TAS and Stereophile have never abandoned the idea that vinyl sounds bette=
r
than CD because, well....just BECAUSE. =A0

A variation on the phrase =A0"... though it didn't quite have the [audiop=
hile flooby jargon] of the [LP|turntable]"
is so common in the audiophile press as to now constitute self-parody.


I am unaware of any individuals named Stereophile or TAS. If you are
speaking of the publications then you are palinly mistaken since they
are both made up of individual writers who hold various beliefs on the
subject and freely express those beliefs and opinions.