The Vinylizer
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:35:59 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):
"Scott" wrote in message
On Aug 5, 4:55 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
On Aug 4, 12:06 pm, Audio Empire
wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 06:41:42 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):
If that's the only valid criteria for you, I'm very
happy to bow out.
He probably means that you haven't done such a test
with a good playback system, optimally set-up and using
decently cared-for records.
You are correct. The test only has merit if the
equipment and LPs are not sub par. I know my equipment
and LPs are up to the task. But I don't think that I
have any exclusive on that.
I find it interesting that these two individuals,
niether of whom I have never met in person, pretend to
have such full knowlege of my livelong listening
experiences.
The improbability of their claims supports their
immediate dismissal.
What is the improbablity of my claims? Show us the math
that leads to the assertion and the facts upon which you
base the math.
It's in the JAES amd IEEE papers I've been referencing here for years.
Apparently people have been ignoring them for years so there is no need for
me to reproduce them so that they can again be ignored.
Nobody is ignoring them, Arny. They are not easily accessible or generally
available. They cost money to download from the AES site and therefore most
people will not bother to access them.
Unless you can come up with some readily available and accessible evidence,
people are going to ignore some of your claims. That's just how it is.
Nothing against you, but if you wish to debate these issues with hard
evidence, it should be evidence available to everybody.
|