The Vinylizer
On Aug 5, 4:55=A0pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
On Aug 4, 12:06 pm, Audio Empire
wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 06:41:42 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):
If that's the only valid criteria for you, I'm very
happy to bow out.
He probably means that you haven't done such a test with
a good playback system, optimally set-up and using
decently cared-for records.
You are correct. The test only has merit if the equipment
and LPs are not sub par. I know my equipment and LPs are
up to the task. But I don't think that I have any
exclusive on that.
I find it interesting that these two individuals, niether of whom I have
never met in person, pretend to have such full knowlege of my livelong
listening experiences.
The improbability of their claims supports their immediate dismissal.
What is the improbablity of my claims? Show us the math that leads to
the assertion and the facts upon which you base the math. Again if the
distortions are as gross as you claim this one would be an easy test
to pass. Why not take the test and have life long bragging rights? You
would finally have that "slam dunk" you keep talking about and there
would be no argument. You'd have it documented to boot.
|