View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,415
Default A question of morality for RAO's resident buffoons (Yes, that'syou and Clyde, 2pid)

On Oct 15, 11:12Â*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 15, 3:52Â*pm, Jenn wrote:





On Oct 15, 12:00Â*pm, ScottW wrote:


On Oct 14, 11:14Â*pm, Jenn wrote:


In article
,


Â*ScottW wrote:
On Oct 14, 7:18Â*pm, Boon wrote:
On Oct 14, 6:25Â*pm, ScottW wrote:


On Oct 13, 8:53Â*pm, Jenn wrote:


In article
,


Â*ScottW2 wrote:
On Oct 13, 5:37Â*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
Â*George M. Middius wrote:


Jenn said:


Remember what happened right after Clinton signed the
"DADT" law? A
couple
of states immediately passed laws making sodomy illegal.
Eighteenth-century
enlightenment, here we come!


And then there's the whole anti-gay marriage crap that 2pid
and his
ilk get all flustered over.


"Gay people can marry those of those of the opposite sex just
like
others." Â*You mean crap like that?


Clyde said that, not Witless.


He would be the "ilk" that was mentioned.


Â*Jenn falls victim to the same stereotype mentality
that she claims persecutes her.


Good job Jenn.


ScottW


It's a direct quote from Clyde. Â*Bring it up with him.


It's your naked "ilk" bigotry that is most repulsive
though I'm sure you lack the self-awareness to see it.


Which begs the question...if you're so repulsed by us, why do you
stay?


Â*It's not your repulsiveness that is repulsive. Â*It's more the facade
of
Jenn's decency that really disgusts.
That's a facade you've never mastered in spite of all your efforts.


Once I realize how prone to bigotry she really is...She's not
intolerable.


OK, I'll bite, troll.


Â* More debating from Jenn. Â*You're naked enough, please stop exposing
yourself.


Â*What, according to you, am I bigoted about?


Anyone who talks about people of an "ilk" are bigots.


Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own
opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the
members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and
intolerance


The group does not have to be racial or ethically defined. Â*That's
just the easiest example to portray.


ScottW


A common definition of "ilk" is "member of a group". The group of
people who share the beliefs thar you and Clyde share about SSM often
use the sentence that I quoted.


It's your presumption of common beliefs that is the basis for all
bigotry.


You are against gay marriage. Clyde is against gay marriage. The
reasons are illogical.

You are of the same ilk no matter how much you weep and wail. Duh.
LOL!

It's really that simple, Scott. If you
wish to believe that I'm a bigot, feel free.


Â*You've proven it. Â*You group people and assert beliefs
they do not equally hold.


So IY(S)O there are "good" reasons to be anti-gay and "bad" reasons
and yours are "good" reasons. LOL!

It only adds fuel for
those who laugh at you though.


Â* Are you so spineless that you care what
the we-minded think?


We all laugh at you for various reasons, 2pid. We are "of the same
ilk" in that regard, dum-dum.

Â* I gave you more credit than that, but I guess I
was wrong.


Wah.

By the way, would those who say things like. "Gay people ____." be
bigots in your view?


Â*No. Â*That's the problem with bigots. Â*Everything is so full
of blanks. Â*Try understanding people as individuals and
stop stereotyping. Â*That only results in you invariably being wrong
and a bigot.


So which gays do you individually support for the right to marry in
California? And whom do you oppose for that right?