[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 10, 2:55*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 10, 7:38*am, Clyde Slick wrote:





On Sep 9, 10:49*pm, ScottW2 wrote:

On Sep 9, 3:19*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
*Obamas czars need vetting more than his speeches to school kids need
vetting.

Obama's czars need vetting more than his lame speeches to
school kids.

Go ahead, try and explain how the two sentences are substantially
or meaningfully different.
This should be a hoot.

ScottW-

the first, is parsed as follows
A needs B more than C needs B

*your original is parsed as follows:
A needs B more than (A needs) C

*That is ridiculous.


No t is not, it is the usual parsing of the syntax you employed.


Obama's czars need vetting more than Obama's czars need his lame
speechs to school kids. * LoL.

*Needs more than is not a phrase any rational person would parse.


LOL!!!
are you that that lacking in self awareness?!?!?!?!that is NOT the
problem )needs more than)the problems are the lack of clarity of the
subjects and the objects
of that statement





Try substituting this,

Obama's czars need vetting more than his lame speeches to

school kids

with this parrallelogram

You need vitamins more than junk food

Now, does than mean that you meed vitamins more than you
need junk food, or
does it *mean that you need vitamins *more than
junk foood needs viatmins ?????

*I think a 5 year old can determine which is correct.


Then I suggest that you get a five year old to write your posts for
you

You are either
A- a complete imbecile
(I know that is not true)
B - totally lacking in self awareness
(possible)
C= argumentative to the point of allowing yourself
to appear to be completely ridiculous
(very evident)
D- being self aware but Completely unwilling to admit even the
most frivolous shortcoming
(very evident)