[ScottW2]

On Sep 9, 7:55*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 9, 9:49*pm, ScottW2 wrote:





On Sep 9, 3:19*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 9, 4:00*pm, ScottW2 wrote:

On Sep 9, 10:37*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 9, 8:07*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 9, 7:56*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 9, 1:38*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 8, 11:16*pm, "ScottW" wrote:

*Obama's czars need vetting more than his lame speeches to
school kids.

ScottW

Right you are~~!!!!
,why would czars *need Obama's lame speeches to school kids?

Poor Obama! He just can't seem to do one thing right! (No pun
intended.)

I think you missed my point.
It was about sentence structure
try to parse this:
"Obama's czars need vetting more than his lame speeches to
school kids."

2pid's meaning is obvious and clear: Obama's czars need vetting more
than Obama's czars need Obama's speeches to school kids.

Apparently Obama's czars like fast American-made sports cars. 2pid was
pointing out their patriotism. No Porches for them!

It's kind of scary, isn't it? I understood exactly what 2pid intended.

*You're both have the comprehension skills of Pelosi.

*Obamas czars need vetting more than his speeches to school kids need
vetting.

\maybe that is what you meant, but it sure wasn't
what you said.
"At least" you got it right the second time

Obama's czars need vetting more than his lame speeches to
school kids.

Go ahead, try and explain how the two sentences are substantially
or meaningfully different.
This should be a hoot.
I expect George, Fraud boy, *and Shhtard to all equally share in
demonstrating the idiotic lengths they will go to look foolish.

Why would we look foolish?

Shhtard makes a strong early break for the fools lead.

ScottW