On Aug 19, 6:25�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Aug 19, 7:11�pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Aug 19, 4:05 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
Can you provide more current data? The author says the gov't hasn't
released any stats since '98.
The question is why you can't offer unbiased or timely data in YOUR
post. It has nothing to do with me. Be a man...be accountable for
once.
Let's look at 2pid's 'logic', shall we?
He's really REALLY mad about TARF. Here are some telling stats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempora...Needy_Families
In 2007 there were less than four million recipient of TARF in the US.
That's right,1.3% of the population. And that number is (or was before
the meltdown, these data do not show 2008 or 2009) going DOWN.
Let's look further!
2pid claims that "1/3 of all welfare recipients in the US are in
California". Goody! Let's do some extrapolatin'!
California spend about $4 billion on TARF, That means that nationwide
the cost is about $12 billion.
Guess what? Even if 2pid eliminated TARF entirely he hasn't saved
enough to keep his brood in dog biscuits for very long. LOL!
As usual, 2pid is really REALLY mad about...nothing...again.
With your departure from Ca. the situation is likely improving but it
doesn't bode well for Texas future.
I'm departing Washington.
Duh.
Duh. They're on the same coast.
2pid 'wins'...again. LoL.
Yes, but Washington is a well-run state with excellent state health
care coverage. California is...well...uh...a ********?