[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 14, 11:49�am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 13, 9:06�pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Aug 13, 7:26 pm, ScottW2 wrote:

On Aug 13, 6:16 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

vinyl anachronist said:

1. Why are amateur blogs said to be less credible than established news
services?
? You can try but your stereotype of something as large as the
blogosphere is IMO, futile.
Okay, I'll make it little more simple for you: Tell me about the
editing and fact-checking standards of a blog compared to public media.

I already gave up on trying to pound some sense into Witless, but since you've
taken up the challenge, please note one phrase in my original question:
amateur blogs. Scottie immediately leaped from my limiting phrase to "the
blogosphere". They are not equivalent.

How do you draw a line between an amateur blog and a non-amateur
blog?

Good question. How do you know?

�I make a subjective assessment upon the quality of their posts and
the validity of their references.

That doesn't answer the original question.


You appear to do it based upon their ideology.

No, I don't. It's just another attempt by you to avoid answering a
very simple question.