[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 13, 5:33�pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 13, 5:26�pm, George M. Middius
wrote:





Doop-de-doop-de-doopty-doo...,

Today I'm adopting a non-trolling policy as I pose my questions for Scottie to
chew on. The following questions are serious, not loaded, and are intended to
initiate a reasoned exchange rather than the usual ridicule-vs-yapping
exchanges. Let's see how far we can get.

1. Why are amateur blogs said to be less credible than established news
services?

� I've only heard that said by MSM who are economically threatened by
them.

Well, at least you allow a few words from the "MSM" to penetrate your bubble.

� So the answer is obvious. �Clearly the credibility of a blog depends
on the blog.

Your conclusion is erroneous. Would you like me to explain why?

� You can try but your stereotype of something as large as the
blogosphere is IMO, futile.


Okay, I'll make it little more simple for you: Tell me about the
editing and fact-checking standards of a blog compared to public media.