[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Aug 11, 1:37*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 11, 10:58*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:

In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Now all we're missing is some valid data to confirm your hypothesis.

You don't get to claim a hypothesisis true without it. That's how it
works.

He's adopted Scottie's "seems to me" standard.

Says the willfully ignorant who won't follow a link.

Learn how to make it worthwhile then, dum-dum.

Three here have tried to teach you how, three have failed.

I didn't say anything about not following a link. Maybe it seemed to
Scottie that I did.

Stephen