Question for Scottie Witlessmongrel
On Aug 11, 10:00�am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:37�am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:16 am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Aug 10, 10:36 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Aug 10, 3:49 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
So you're here to be an asshole. All righty then.
If that means not conforming to your way of thinking, I guess so.
No...it just means you're here to misbehave. I don't have a problem
with that as long as you're entertaining.
And there it is. Misbehaving is ok as long as you find it amusing.
Misbehaving is okay as long as you take it in the right spirit. If you
take it personally, then you probably should stay away from Usenet.
I don't find childish immaturity entertaining so are you going to
stop?
You mean, am I going to bow to your every whim and desire? No.
Some people obviously think
that you are.
The difference is I don't care what some people think, particularly
those who indulge in immaturity for their own amusement.
Then why don't you avoid them? Why do you constantly engage them?
�Most of the time I do. �I see your little peanut gallery snipes.
They usually lack substance and aren't worthy of a response.
That would be your opinion. I look at your excessive OT threads and
feel they also lack substance, especially when derived from such
blatantly biased people as Michelle Malkin.
You think wit can make up for lack of substance and knowledge.
Now you know what I think? LoL. No, I think wit can make a discussion
forum a much more interesting place to be. But exchanging information
should be a primary goal.
�I don't.
I prefer to discuss current political events.
That's nice, but there are forums designed for that.
� This forum has little to no audio discussion.
I participated in one yesterday.
Yet with Arny gone there is no one that is going to disrupt
anything the comes up on-topic.
The right people have to come back. You and Bratzi aren't enough to
attract them.
Meanwhile, everyone here engages in off-topic discussion.
Midiot does his silly sniping.
Jenn rants against Fox.
You get sprung over Palin.
Everyone here has started off-topic threads.
You've just decided you don't like the topics I raise
because they don't spawn nice friendly donut hole like
discussions. �Too bad.
It has nothing to do with OT discussions. Most of us have known each
other for many years, and it's perfectly natural to talk about other
topics. Excessively spamming the group with right-wing and nationalist
links is another story, It violates the Usenet charter.
Do you see the difference, or is your world still black and white?
You prefer donut holes and T-shirts.
To what, your excessive OT posting?
�LoL. �You're off-topic as much as anyone.
You just want to decide what is acceptably entertaining
to you and what isn't.
It's called an opinion. Hence, rec.audio.opinion. And my opinion that
excessive OT spamming hurts the group.
�Your complaints are hypocritical.
You're failing to understand my complaints, so your point is moot.
I don't find donut holes and T-shirts any more entertaining than the
childish ridicule and unsubstantiated insults but it is more tolerable
It doesn't matter what you think about donut holes and T-shirts. I had
a nice, friendly conversation with at least two other people here on a
subject we all found interesting.
�And I didn't interfere nor do I complain about it beyond pointing
out the hypocrisy of your complaints.
That's interfering. It also makes YOU the hypocrite, not me. (That's
not a IKYABWAI but simple logic.)
Evidently you are against nice,
friendly conversations or else you would have more of them.
That's a matter of perspective.
Who other than you thinks you have nice friendly conversations here?
Name one person. In other words, we're talking about YOUR prespective,
right?
You certainly aren't nice in a couple peoples perspective.
You mean people who tell lies about my family or write emails to my
business associates? You should know better than to make that comment.
But go ahead and be nice if you can. Unlike you, I won't try to stop
you.
I'm nice to more people here than you are.
|