[George's Pro Sound Co.]

"flipper" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:44:38 -0700, "Bob Eld"
wrote:


"Michael Dobony" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:14:48 +1000, Soundhaspriority wrote:

wrote in message


Honestly, if she isn't tough enough to deal with the media now, what
makes people think she can handle it in 2012? I had her pegged as a
nutso from the beginning.

Me, too. And I *KNOW* nutsos.


Listen to her interview. She is now able to function as governor when
everything she does involves a court fight. That is NOT effective
management. It is better for Alaska to step down. The corrupt news
media
and spoiled brat dumbocrats just will not allow her to function as
governor.

Yeah right, it's the Democrats and the Press's fault. Please tell us again
how republicans are for personal responsibility. I'm all ears.

Keep in mind that everything said or reported on over the last months has
been in response to something Palin as done or said. Nobody put words in
her mouth. Her latest bit of Palinism, said yesterday, is that she is NOT
a
QUITTER! I suppose in your mind we are just supposed to accept that
without
comment. The world doesn't work that way. If you don't know when to hold
them or when to fold them, you open yourself to comment or more. Palin has
been doing that all along, never knowing when to shut up or quiet the
waters. She just keeps stepping in it then expects everyone to say
nothing.
The problem is Palin, not the Dems or the Press. BTW Palin's worst enemies
are fellow Republicans, not the Dems.


I'm afraid you are demonstrating blind partisanship because you
clearly have no idea what the issue, which has nothing to do with, as
you put it, her 'mouth', is and if you had actually listened to the
speech you imply to have heard you'd have heard her explain that the
incessant loony tunes left trash 'ethics complaints' were a prime
motivation for her decision because, besides wasting official State
time and resources in 'investigating' such serious charges as holding
a fish in a photograph, these 'death by a thousand cuts' law suits,
not a single one being of any merit, have personally cost her, so far,
$500,000, perhaps more, to defend against and there was no indication
the ass wipes who perpetrate those things were ever going to stop
because it costs them nothing to make asinine, nonsensical,
accusations.

But in this day and age, where a Democrat Congress is screaming to
'investigate' and literally put in jail previous administration
lawyers who did nothing more than render opinions they dislike, and to
hell with the first amendment, plus a dozen more Constitutional and
common law protections, I can't say I'm terribly surprised you'd find
no problem with hounding an official out of office.

And I'm sorry to say, without even getting into other atrocities like
queen Pelosi not letting people even read, much less debate, bills
before her legislative serfs pass them, that's the unprincipled state
the loony tunes left has drug your party down to.

this is all little podunk bickering compared to the grand inqusition the
pubs pulled on BC over monica.
Palin is unethical and it is proper that ethics investigations be held to
hold her accountable for her holier than thou attituted and her abuses of
power
george