[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 3, 11:00*am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jul 3, 8:54*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

So far your only defense in this case is the featured guests are

I do not have to defend a thing, dum-dum. I'm not involved with it.

*LoL. *You don't have to breath or bow during your party worship
either.


Duh.

unwitting pawns not knowing the true reason for their attendance
which is absurd.

"Sponsor".

Um, 2pid? Do you suppose just for an instant that somebody printed a
flyer that wasn't vetted?

*I do.

I rest my case. You've just admitted to the possibility of an
overzealous marketing department.

*I mean, do you *really* believe the WP would
print a flyer saying "politicians for sale"?

Apparently yes. *The issue the WaPo seems most concerned about
is that newsroom reporters were for sale.
Politicians and beaurocrats are a readily available commodity.

Duh.

What they're concerned about is even the appearance they were, dum-
dum.

Do you think they printed and distributed a flyer with no
featured guests agreement to attend?

2pid, are you *really* this thick? LoL.

A dinner gets set up. Guests are invited and accept. The marketing
department prints a flyer for potential sponsors that is not what the
people having the dinner expected.

If there's more, it will turn up. I very seriously doubt that if
politicians were for sale they'd print a flyer announcing it.

What a moron. LoL.