On Jun 25, 1:52*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 24, 1:10*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 24, 2:44*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 24, 12:31*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 24, 2:08*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 23, 2:42*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 23, 1:41*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 22, 10:07*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 23, 12:00*am, ScottW2 wrote:
cheney accused Congress of "undermining *the troops".
*OMG. *A calamity of epic proportions.
Calling Congress "traitors" in a time of war is very serious, 2pid.
*Poor shhh. *All this argument does is reveal your confusion.
LoL.
There are words and there are definitions.
Indeed.
Sometimes the definition of a word changes with context.
No, it doesn't. A car is still a car. Irony is irony. Mockery is
mockery.
and stupidity is stupidity especially when it's yours.
You just shot your own argument down, dum-dum.
*You still haven't figured out the simple difference between legal
opposition to a war
and false accusations of war crimes in time of war.
What I understand is that cheney said Congress was "undermining the
troops". You said Kerry was "undermining the troops". You also said
that republicans haven't falsely accused Dems of being traitors or
treasonous. You were wrong.
BTW, as far as "false accusations" you're wrong there too:
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...0,690199.story
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...,0,92368.story
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...,5332923.story
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...,5712402.story
This report is based in part on records of the Vietnam War Crimes
Working Group, on file at the National Archives in College Park, Md.
The collection includes 241 case summaries that chronicle more than
300 substantiated atrocities by U.S. forces and 500 unconfirmed
allegations.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...,6850596.story
There were no "false" accusations.
*That you cannot see that difference must be frightening to anyone who
serves with you.
Oh lord. LoL.
I have a reputation (found on my always-outstanding OERs) of being
"cool under pressure, very intelligent, rational and fair, a solid
leader and one of the best tactical planners" that these officers had
ever rated.
What did your OERs say, 2pid? I think I know. LoL.
"An emotional trainwreck. Can't focus. Lashes out at the slightest
provocation. Cannot digest or process even simple information.
Argumentative with superiors and subordinates alike. Should be tested
for autism as he's frequently found spinning in circles. DO NOT
PROMOTE." LoL.